Pursuant to § 211.5, each applicant who meets the minimum requirements for the position and who receives a score of seventy (70) points or more during the initial screening process is eligible for consideration for appointment. The eligible applicants comprise the "register" of eligible applicants.
For purposes of § 216.1, OAG may develop and implement rating and ranking tools necessary for validating applicant scores and assessing candidates. If an applicant's initial screening score is invalidated using these tools, the candidate may be rejected from further consideration.
A register shall remain in existence until exhausted, except when an earlier termination date is authorized by OAG.
OAG may require an applicant to provide documentary evidence of his or her qualifications and eligibility for any employment preference claimed prior to his or her inclusion in the register.
At the option of the selecting official, the number of applicants forwarded to the selecting official for his or her consideration shall be either the top five (5) or top ten (10) highest-scoring candidates.
Selecting officials shall employ assessment tools consistent with §§ 217 and 218 to select appointees from the applicants forwarded for consideration. If the position is not filled from the forwarded applicants, the selecting official shall provide a written justification for non-selection. Thereafter, the next five (5) or ten (10) highest scoring candidates shall be submitted to the selecting official for consideration. This pattern of justification for non-selection and submission of candidates to the selecting official shall continue until the position is filled or the register is exhausted.
Hiring managers may seek approval from the Attorney General or designee to select candidates based on their initial screening scores rather than subsequent assessments or evaluations. When this occurs, the candidate who receives the highest score shall be given a conditional offer of employment for the position. In the event more than one candidate is tied for the highest score, a candidate shall be appointed based on the following order of priority:
Notwithstanding § 402.2, whenever OAG considers a current or former District of Columbia employee for a competitive appointment, OAG shall conduct a general suitability assessment.
Should a candidate subsequently fail to meet any suitability requirements pursuant to Chapter 4, the selecting official may select another candidate in accordance with §§ 216.5 through 216.7.
Any candidates remaining on a register after a selection has been made may be transferred to the register for any established vacancy with the same area of consideration. OAG is not required to make such a transfer.
D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 6, r. 6-C216