The following definitions are applicable to this part:
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-91
(1969, P.A. 828, S. 92; P.A. 92-260, S. 35.)
Language is clear and does not lend itself to any equivocal interpretation. 173 C. 165. Cited. 177 C. 335; 179 Conn. 328; 188 C. 406; 191 Conn. 604; 200 Conn. 586; 209 Conn. 733; 211 Conn. 672; 215 Conn. 716; 216 Conn. 647; 219 Conn. 489; 225 C. 347; 226 Conn. 618. Terms "restrained" and "abducted" interpreted to include frightening victim to remain in bedroom through repeated physical and verbal abuse. 258 C. 510. The point at which an intended interference with liberty under Subdiv. (1) crosses the line to become an intended prevention of liberation under Subdiv. (2) is not entirely clear. 287 C. 509. Cited. 20 Conn.App. 437; 46 Conn.App. 486; 55 CA 447. Subdiv. (1): Cited. 180 C. 565; 195 Conn. 253; 198 Conn. 147; Id., 430; Id., 537; 202 Conn. 520; 215 C. 173; 237 Conn. 284. Cited. 5 CA 586; 13 Conn.App. 667; 17 Conn.App. 339; 19 CA 396; 30 Conn.App. 281; 31 Conn.App. 312. Subdiv. (2): Cited. 172 C. 22; 177 C. 637; 178 C. 634; 182 Conn. 449; 199 Conn. 537. Cited. 36 Conn.App. 190. To prove unlawful restraint, the state had to prove that defendant abducted alleged victim by restraining her with intent to prevent her liberation by using or threatening to use physical force or intimidation. 81 CA 320.