Ohio. R. Superi. Ct. 42
Commentary (July 1, 1997)
This rule is analogous to former C.P. Sup. R. 8.01(B). No changes were made in the 1997 amendments to the Rules of Superintendence.
Commentary (January 1, 1996 Amendment)
Two significant changes have been made to this rule pertaining to complex litigation. First, counsel and the trial judge are in the best position to assess the factors set forth in division (A)(1) to (7) of the rule and determine whether the case merits designation as complex litigation. Accordingly, the process of designating a case as complex litigation is revised to allow an attorney, with the consent of his or her client, to make a request and to have the designation made by the trial judge. The trial judge also may designate a case as complex litigation without a request from counsel. Through Sup. R. 4 and by reviewing and signing Common Pleas Report Form A, the administrative judge of the general division will continue to monitor complex litigation determinations and ensure uniform application of the criteria throughout the division. If the trial judge is considering the designation of a case as complex litigation without a request from counsel, he or she should inform the parties of that fact and the significance of the designation. Once a determination has been made, the judge should notify the parties.
The second revision extends the time for making a complex litigation determination from ninety days to six months. Under the former rule, the complexities of a case often were not apparent within three months of filing, and the additional three months provided by this rule will allow for a more complete and accurate assessment and designation.