Ohio R. Superi. Ct. 41

As amended through October 15, 2024

Rule 41 - Conflict of Trial Court Assignment Dates, Continuances and Engaged Counsel

(A) Continuances; granting of. The continuance of a scheduled trial or hearing is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court for good cause shown.

No party shall be granted a continuance of a trial or hearing without a written motion from the party or counsel stating the reason for the continuance, endorsed in writing by the party as well as counsel, provided that the trial judge may waive this requirement upon a showing of good cause. No court shall grant a continuance to any party at any time without first setting a definite date for the trial or hearing.

When a continuance is requested by reason of the unavailability of a witness at the time scheduled for trial or hearing, the court shall consider the feasibility of resorting to the several methods of recording testimony permitted by Civil Rule 30(B) and authorized for use by Civil Rule 32(A)(3).

(B) Conflict of Trial Date Assignments

(1) When a continuance is requested for the reasons that counsel is scheduled to appear in another case assigned for trial on the same date in the same or another trial court of this state, the case which was first set for trial shall have priority and shall be tried on the date assigned. Criminal cases assigned for trial have priority over civil cases assigned for trial. The court should not consider any motion for a continuance due to a conflict of trial assignment dates unless a copy of the conflicting assignment is attached to the motion and the motion is filed not less than thirty days prior to trial.

(2) Except as provided in division (B)(3) of this rule, a continuance shall be granted, upon request, under either of the following circumstances:

(a) A party, counsel, or witness under subpoena is scheduled to appear on the same date at a hearing before the Board of Professional Conduct of the Supreme Court as a member of the Board, as a party, as counsel for a party, or as a witness under subpoena for the hearing;

(b) Counsel requesting the continuance will be unavailable to participate in the judicial proceeding because counsel is a member of the General Assembly whose attendance is required at a scheduled voting session or committee meeting of the General Assembly.

(3) In considering a continuance requested pursuant to division (B)(2)(b) of this rule, the court may require counsel to obtain the consent of the client and provide notice to all other parties to the action. The court may deny the requested continuance if either or both of the following apply:

(a) Counsel has been granted prior continuances in the same case based on attendance at scheduled voting sessions or committee meetings of the General Assembly;

(b) The court determines that further delay in the proceeding would result in substantial prejudice to a party.

(C) Engaged counsel. If a designated trial attorney has such a number of cases assigned for trial in courts of this state so as to cause undue delay in the disposition of such cases, the administrative judge may summon such trial attorney who persistently requests continuances and extensions to warn the attorney of the possibility of sanctions and to encourage the attorney to make necessary adjustments in the management of his or her practice. Where such measures fail, restrictions may properly be imposed by the administrative judge on the number of cases in which the attorney may participate at any one time.

(D) Continuances; reporting. Trial continuances shall be reported on a monthly basis to the administrative judge. Where a judge is persistently and unreasonably indulgent in granting continuances or extensions, the administrative judge shall investigate the reasons for the excessive continuances and take appropriate corrective action at the local level. If corrective action at the local level is unsuccessful, the administrative judge shall report that fact to the Case Management Section of the Supreme Court. If it comes to the attention of the Case Management Section that the judge of a single-judge division is persistently and unreasonably indulgent in granting continuances, it shall report the information to the Chief Justice, who shall take appropriate corrective action.

Ohio. R. Superi. Ct. 41

Last amended effective 8/11/2015.

Commentary (July 1, 1997)

Rule 41 consolidates the provisions of former C.P. Sup. R. 7 and M.C. Sup. R. 16.

Rule 41(A) Continuances; granting of.

Division (A) provides that the granting of a continuance is within the sound discretion of the court, and only upon a showing of good cause.

Written motion must be filed specifying the reason for the continuance. The motion must be signed by the party requesting the continuance, as well as their counsel. The requirement that the motion be signed by the party may be waived by the trial judge, for good cause. If a continuance is granted, the court shall, at that time, reset the trial or hearing for a definite date.

If a continuance is requested because of the unavailability of a witness, the court is required to consider the feasibility of recording testimony as permitted by Civ. R. 30(B).

The standards relating to court delay reduction adopted by the American Bar Association focus, to a great extent, upon the limitation of continuances as a means of expediting case dispositions.

Rule 41(B) Conflict of trial assignment dates

Division (B) sets priorities among all trial courts for resolution of conflicts when counsel is assigned for trial in more than one court on the same date.

When a continuance is requested by reason of conflict, the case first set for trial is to be given priority and tried on the date assigned. Priority is dependent on firm assignment for trial. Thus, a general policy of early assignment to achieve priority would be inconsistent with the purpose of this rule. Within this general system, criminal cases assigned for trial are to be accorded priority over civil cases.

Attached to the motion for a continuance should be a copy of the conflicting assignment, and the motion should be filed not less than thirty days prior to the trial sought to be continued. These provisions are not mandatory, and there may be situations where compliance with one or both is not possible.

Rule 41(C) Engaged counsel

Division (C) gives the administrative judge authority to restrict the number of cases that an attorney may handle at one time if trial counsel has so many cases assigned for trial that undue delay is caused in the disposition of those cases.

Rule 41(D) Continuances; reporting.

Division (D) of this rule requires the administrative judge to take action if it appears that a judge grants an inappropriate number of continuances. The administrative judge shall first take corrective action at the local level. If that action is not successful, the administrative judge has the duty to refer the matter to the Case Management Section. The Case Management Section also has the responsibility to refer any matter to the Chief Justice for corrective action if it is brought to its attention that the judge of a single-judge division or court appears to be granting an inappropriate number of continuances.