Ala. R. App. P. 28
Committee Comments
Rule 28 works a change in the form of briefs as the same has existed before under Alabama practice. Inasmuch as assignments of error are unnecessary, all of the machinery and paraphernalia for arguing briefs according to assignments of error is also abolished. See Rule 20, Briefs will be oriented toward the issues presented in a case and argued accordingly.
Subdivision (e) envisions that the record on appeal shall be numbered consecutively, centered at the bottom of the page, as provided by Rule 10 and 11.
The page limitations on briefs are provided in the expectation that most briefs will be typed and then reproduced by photocopying rather than by commercial printing. The rule is not intended to force parties into commercial printing, since such printing system is often prohibitively expensive.
Court Comment to Amendments Effective October 1, 1991.
Rule 28(e) was amended to aid in distinguishing between page references in briefs, because "CR" and "RT" references are now removed pursuant to the amended Rule 10(b). All references to the appendix system have been omitted. Rule 28(g) was modified to limit argument length in the rehearing brief to that of the reply brief.
Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 28(c) Effective February 1, 1994.
This amendment added the second sentence (beginning "A reply brief need contain only ...") in order to make it clear what a reply brief must contain.
Court Comment to Amendment to Rule 28(g) Effective May 8, 2001.
This amendment deletes the reference to page-length requirements for rehearing briefs. The requirements for those briefs are addressed in Rule 40.
Court Comment to Amendment to Rule 28 Effective June 1, 2002
This amendment to Rule 28 changes the format for briefs submitted to Alabama appellate courts. In addition to the items required to be included in the brief before this amendment, Rule 28 requires a statement regarding oral argument (Rule 28(a)(1)); a statement of jurisdiction, except for briefs in criminal cases (Rule 28(a)(3)); a statement of the standard of review for each issue (Rule 28(a)(8)); a summary of argument (Rule 28(a)(9)); and a certificate of service (Rule 28(a)(12)). A conclusory statement of the standard of review is sufficient, reserving any argument as to the standard of review for the argument portion of the brief. For example, in an appeal where the issue invokes an exercise of a trial court's discretion, the appellant shall state that the standard of review is whether the trial court abused its discretion. On appeals involving the trial court's formulation of the law or applying a rule of law or involving a question of the sufficiency of the evidence or the factual findings, the appellant shall describe the governing standard of review (e.g., de novo, clearly erroneous findings of fact, etc.). The amendment also provides that citations to authority shall comply with the latest edition of either The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation or the ALWD [Association of Legal Writing Directors'] Citation Manual: A Professional System of Citation or the style and form used in opinions of the Supreme Court of Alabama. Reply briefs must now include a table of contents, a table of authorities, a summary of the argument, an argument, and a certificate of service (Rule 28(c)). The provisions of former Rule 28(g), dealing with the length of briefs, have been moved to Rule 32(a)(6).
Committee Comments to Amendment To Rule 28 Effective June 1, 2005
Subsection (a)(7) has been amended to make known that if the Supreme Court grants certiorari review and issues a writ of certiorari, the petitioner need not include a statement of facts in the petitioner's brief because a statement of facts was attached as an exhibit to the petition.
Subdivision (h) has been added to indicate in Rule 28 the color of the cover of the briefs to be filed with the appellate court. See also Rule 32(a)(2).
Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 28(a) (5) Effective August 1, 2015
Rule 28(a) (5) has been amended to require that the appellant's brief in civil cases cite all adverse rulings from which the appeal is taken and include references to the record on appeal where those adverse rulings can be found.
Committee Comment to Amendment to Rule 28(a) Effective October 1, 2020
Rule 28(a) has been amended to be consistent with new Rule 32(d), by adding new subsection (12) requiring a certificate of compliance with the font and word limits and renumbering what was subsection (12) as subsection (13).
Committee Comment to Amendment to Rule 28(j) Effective October 1, 2020
Rule 28(j) has been amended to provide a word limit for most briefs consistent with the amendment to Rule 32, but to retain page limits for briefs filed pro se.
Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 28(j) Effective May 3, 2021
Rule 28(j) has been amended to clarify that the larger word/page limitation specified in Rule 28(j)(2) applies only to cases in which the death penalty has been imposed and not to cases involving a conviction for a capital offense but resulting in a sentence other than the death penalty. This rule applies to both direct and collateral appeals.
Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 28(d)(6) Effective July 9, 2021
Rule 28(d)(6) has been amended to delete the requirement to list facsimile numbers on the cover of briefs. Many attorneys no longer maintain a facsimile number.
Committee Comment to Amendment to Rule 28(j)(1) Effective October 1, 2024
The purpose of this amendment is to ensure that the page numbers on the PDF version of a brief match the page numbers printed at the bottom of each page of the brief. The amendment replaces lower-case Roman numerals, such as "ii," "iii," and "iv," on the pages containing the initial sections of the brief (e.g., a statement regarding oral argument, a table of contents, a statement of jurisdiction (if applicable), and a table of authorities), with Arabic numerals, such as "2," "3," and "4." Pagination will start with the cover of the brief, but the number "1" will not be shown on the cover. The next page will show the number "2," and so on. This amendment will aid the appellate courts and the parties in finding pages of one brief that are referred to in another brief. The amendment does not affect the word count for a brief or the sections of a brief that are included in determining the word count.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order [amending] Rule 28(g), effective May 8, 2001, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 785 So.2d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 5, Rule 21(d), Rule 27(d), Rule 28, Rule 32, Rule 39(d), Rule 39(f), Rule 39(h), and Rule 40(g), effective June 1, 2002, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 798 So.2d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 21(a), Rule 28, Rule 31(b), Rule 32(a) and (b), Rule 34(a), Rule 39, and Rule 40(g), effective June 1, 2005, and adopting Rule 25A, effective June 1, 2005, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 890 So. 2d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 10(b), Rule 10(c), Rule 28, Rule 32(a), and Rule 32(b), and adopting Rule 39(c)(3) and the Court Comment to Rule 10(b) and Rule 10(c), effective October 31, 2005, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 914 So.2d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending, effective June 1, 2010, Rule 28(d)(8), Rule 32(a), and Rule 52, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, and adopting Rule 56 and the Court Comment to Rule 56, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 26 So. 3d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 22, Rule 28(a)(5), Rule 32(a)(7), and Rule 40(f), effective August 1, 2015, and adopting the Committee Comments to those amendments to Rule 28(a)(5), Rule 32(a)(7), and Rule 40(f) is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 160 So. 3d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 5(e), Rule 21(d), Rule 27(d), Rule 28(a), Rule 28(j), Rule 28A(c), Rule 28B, Rule 32, Rule 39(d), Rule 40(f), and Rule 40(g), effective October 1, 2020, and adopting Committee Comments to those amendments is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 296 So. 3d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 28(j) and adopting the Committee Comments thereto, effective May 3, 2021, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from __ So. 3d
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 28(d)(6), Rule 32(a)(3)(A), and Rule 32(a)(4), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, and adopting the Committee Comments thereto, effective July 9, 2021, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from __ So. 3d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 28(j)(1), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, and adopting the Committee Comment thereto, effective October 1, 2024, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from __ So. 3d.