Upon receipt of a properly filed emergency motion, the clerk of the appellate court may attempt to contact counsel for the nonmovant, or the nonmoving pro se party, to ascertain whether a response will be filed before the date by which the movant desires a ruling, which may be less than the 7 days (1 week) provided in this rule for filing a response in nonemergency matters. The appellate court will decide in its discretion whether the motion warrants expedited treatment, as well as whether a response from the nonmovant is necessary before the court rules on the motion.
Ala. R. App. P. 27
Committee Comments
This rule provides the method whereby all papers not otherwise specified in the rules are to be filed with the court. It envisions a simple typewritten motion, in sufficient copies for all judges of the court to which the motion is directed, and proof of service on all parties. Certain motions are permitted to be acted upon by the court without awaiting a response from opposing parties, and these are enumerated in subdivision (b). However, all such motions are subject to review at the request of a party for reconsideration, vacation or modification.
Subdivision (c) generally disallows oral argument on motions. To have oral argument on a motion, a party is required to seek an order from the court.
The form of motions is set out in Rule 32(b).
Committee Comment to Amendment to Rule 27(d) Effective October 1, 2020
Rule 27(d) has been amended to provide a word limit for most motions and memoranda consistent with the amendment to Rule 32, but to retain page limits for motions and memoranda filed pro se.
Committee Comments to Adoption of Rule 27(e) Effective August 1, 2021
Rule 27(e) has been added to aid a party in obtaining expedited relief from an appellate court for an emergency (i.e., extraordinary circumstances in which waiting for the normal timing of the appellate process will be inadequate for some reason). Section (e) does not apply to death-penalty matters. Extraordinary circumstances warranting expedited relief may include, for example, that a matter will become moot, that irreparable harm will be suffered, or that adequate relief will be unavailable if a matter is not ruled on expeditiously by the appellate court. By contrast, an example of a matter not usually warranting expedited relief would be a trial court's denial of a motion to dismiss on jurisdictional or immunity grounds and the losing party's having to litigate the matter while a mandamus petition challenging the denial of the motion to dismiss is pending. Further, a request for expedited relief that originates in whole or in part out of the movant's own unwarranted delay in filing for relief until a short amount of time remains for consideration of the request will be viewed as arising from a self-created emergency and will be highly disfavored.
When the need for an expedited ruling occurs after an appellate court has acquired jurisdiction, the movant may file a motion that contains the information required by section (e). Unless an emergency motion is filed in an existing appeal or in connection with a petition for extraordinary relief under Rule 21, Ala. R. App. P., that is currently pending before the appellate court, the movant should be aware that the appellate court will lack jurisdiction over the motion unless it accompanies a new filing that would serve to confer jurisdiction on the appellate court, such as a petition for extraordinary relief. Creating an accelerated timetable for both the filing of any response in opposition to an emergency motion and the disposition of the motion falls within the authority afforded appellate courts to suspend the Rules of Appellate Procedure under certain circumstances, as noted in Rule 2(b), Ala. R. App. P., and, therefore, the filing of the response to, and the disposition of, the motion may occur in a period less than the seven days ordinarily permitted for responding to nonemergency motions under this rule.
Lastly, the movant should also provide the appellate court with all applicable filing fees, if any, and/or required paper copies of the emergency motion at the time of filing. The movant should check with the reviewing appellate court before filing the emergency motion to ascertain exactly what will be needed. It is the duty of the movant to provide the reviewing appellate court with everything necessary to facilitate an expeditious resolution of any motion for emergency or expedited relief.
Committee Comments to Amendments to Rule 27(a) and Rule 27(d) Effective January 1, 2023
The rule has been amended to clarify that a party filing a motion may file a reply to a response in opposition to the motion. Any reply shall not exceed 1,000 words (5 pages for a reply filed pro se).
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 5, Rule 21(d), Rule 27(d), Rule 28, Rule 32, Rule 39(d), Rule 39(f), Rule 39(h), and Rule 40(g), effective June 1, 2002, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from ___ So. 2d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 5(e), Rule 21(d), Rule 27(d), Rule 28(a), Rule 28(j), Rule 28A(c), Rule 28B, Rule 32, Rule 39(d), Rule 40(f), and Rule 40(g), effective October 1, 2020, and adopting Committee Comments to those amendments is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 296 So. 3d.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order adopting Rule 21(g) and Rule 27(e), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, and adopting the Committee Comments thereto, effective August 1, 2021, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from __ So. 3d.
"Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 27(a), Rule 27(d), and Rule 32(b)(5), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, and adopting the Committee Comments thereto, effective January 1, 2023, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from __ So. 3d."
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 5(e), Rule 21(d), Rule 27(d), Rule 31(b), Rule 39(e), and Rule 57, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, and adopting the Court Comment to the amendment of Rule 57, effective January 1, 2024, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from __ So. 3d.