Current through Register Vol. 56, No. 23, December 2, 2024
Section 17:19-3.6 - Major project selection procedures(a) The selection process will be initiated upon the receipt by the DPMC of a request from a State client agency for consultant services. The written request shall include a description of the scope of work of the project, the time period in which the design and construction is to be completed and a current working cost estimate (if applicable) of the proposed project for both design and the construction of the project.(b) A selection committee will be established to select a consultant for that specific project. The selection committee shall develop the selection evaluation criteria for the project. The evaluation criteria will be part of the public notice. The evaluation criteria for each project will generally include the following: firm's experience on projects of a similar size and nature; project team experience; past project performance; project approach; understanding of project needs; project schedule, budget and cost estimating; and/or other criteria as determined to be appropriate.(c) The evaluation process may include submission of specific project questionnaire forms, technical proposals, past performance and interviews.(d) Each individual member of the selection committee will evaluate all submissions based upon specific criteria and prepare a selection evaluation. The selection coordinator shall compile all evaluation scores and prepare a ranking. The chairperson shall call for a meeting of the selection committee to review the ranking and shortlist the appropriate number of firms for further consideration. Additional technical and/or organizational information may be requested from the firms before a final ranking is prepared.(e) When the selection committee completes the ranking, cost proposals shall be solicited from the highest ranked firms.(f) Site visits, pre-interview conferences and pre-proposal conferences may be scheduled. Attendance shall be mandatory when so stipulated.(g) Sealed cost proposals will be accepted on a pre-determined date and time by the selection coordinator. The selection committee will meet to open and review the cost proposals. Upon completion of the review, the selection committee may begin negotiations with the highest ranked firm or firms for a cost proposal that is fair and reasonable to the State. As required, the selection committee may request additional meetings, additional technical, organizational or cost data from any of the firms. If a satisfactory conclusion cannot be reached with the highest ranked firm or firms, the selection committee may negotiate with the next highest ranked firm or firms.(h) The selection committee shall have the responsibility to recommend to the Director the selection of the firm that is the highest ranked and whose cost proposal is fair and reasonable to the State.(i) The selection evaluations, rankings, negotiations and cost proposals of all firms, as well as all discussions and correspondence, relating to a consultant selection remain confidential until the contract is awarded.N.J. Admin. Code § 17:19-3.6
Amended by R.2000 d.76, effective 2/22/2000.
See: 31 N.J.R. 4237(a), 32 N.J.R. 712(a).
In (a), inserted a reference to consultant services at the end of the first sentence; and rewrote (b) and (g) through (i).
Recodified from N.J.A.C. 17:19-5.7 and amended by R.2008 d.363, effective 12/1/2008.
See: 40 N.J.R. 3959(a), 40 N.J.R. 6825(a).
In (b), substituted "selection evaluation" for "rating schedule and", substituted "evaluation" for "rating" twice, and inserted "past project performance;"; in (c), substituted "evaluation" for "rating" and inserted "past performance"; in (d), substituted "selection evaluation" for "rating" and "evaluation scores" for "ratings"; and in (i), substituted "selection evaluations, rankings" for "rating, ranking". Former N.J.A.C. 17:19-3.6, Procedures, period of suspension and scope of suspension affecting the suspension of a firm(s) or an individual(s), recodified to N.J.A.C. 17:19-4.6.