NOTE: If a municipality intends to take independent enforcement actions related to the contractor certification requirements of 38 M.R.S.A. Section 439-B, they should insert the following into the application requirements of their ordinance:
The applicant shall have the burden of proving that the proposed land use activity is in conformity with the purposes and provisions of this Ordinance.
After the submission of a complete application to the Planning Board, the Board shall approve an application or approve it with conditions if it makes a positive finding based on the information presented that the proposed use:
If a permit is either denied or approved with conditions, the reasons as well as conditions shall be stated in writing. No approval shall be granted for an application involving a structure if the structure would be located in an unapproved subdivision or would violate any other local ordinance, or regulation or statute administered by the municipality.
If the floodway is not shown on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Maps, it is deemed to be 1/2 the width of the 100-year flood-plain.
NOTE: Whether an administrative appeal is decided on an "appellate" basis or on a "de novo" basis, or whether an enforcement decision is appealable to the board of appeals, shall be the decision of the municipality through its specific ordinance language. The Department is not mandating one alternative over the other. If a municipality chooses appeals procedures different from those in Section 16(H), it is recommended that assistance be sought from legal counsel to ensure that the adopted language is legally sound.
When the Board of Appeals reviews a decision of the Code Enforcement Officer the Board of Appeals shall hold a "de novo" hearing. At this time the Board may receive and consider new evidence and testimony, be it oral or written. When acting in a "de novo" capacity the Board of Appeals shall hear and decide the matter afresh, undertaking its own independent analysis of evidence and the law, and reaching its own decision.
When the Board of Appeals hears a decision of the Planning Board, it shall hold an appellate hearing, and may reverse the decision of the Planning Board only upon finding that the decision was contrary to specific provisions of the Ordinance or contrary to the facts presented to the Planning Board. The Board of Appeals may only review the record of the proceedings before the Planning Board. The Board Appeals shall not receive or consider any evidence which was not presented to the Planning Board, but the Board of Appeals may receive and consider written or oral arguments. If the Board of Appeals determines that the record of the Planning Board proceedings are inadequate, the Board of Appeals may remand the matter to the Planning Board for additional fact finding.
Appeal of a reconsidered decision to Superior Court must be made within fifteen (15) days after the decision on reconsideration.
NOTE: Current penalties include fines of not less than $100 nor more than $2500 per violation for each day that the violation continues. However, in a resource protection district the maximum penalty is increased to $5000 (38 M.R.S.A. section 4452).
06- 096 C.M.R. ch. 1000, § 16