EXAMPLE 1: In its application for approval of its STC plan, Company C provides assurances that it will continue to provide health and retirement benefits to its employees in the affected unit under the same terms and conditions it would have if the employees' usual hours of work had not been reduced. Despite these assurances, Company C reduces health benefits to its employees in the affected unit in proportion to its reduction of their hours of work and Company C reduces the retirement benefits that it was providing to the employees in the affected unit. Both the reduction in the health benefits and the reduction of the retirement benefits constitute a failure of the employer to comply with assurances given in the STC plan. Either of these failures to comply with an assurance given in the plan constitutes good cause for the Director to revoke approval of the plan.
EXAMPLE 2: In its application for approval of its STC plan for its sales unit, Company D provides assurances that while the STC plan is in operation, it will not hire additional full-time or part-time employees for the affected unit, and that while the STC plan is in operation, it will not transfer employees to the affected unit. Despite these assurances, while the STC plan is in operation Company D hires one full-time employee and two part-time employees for its sales unit and transfers an employee to its sales unit who was working in its telemarketing department at the time of the transfer. Both the hiring of the new employees and the transfer into the unit of another employee constitute a failure of the employer to comply with an assurance given in the STC plan. Any of these failures to comply with an assurance given in the plan constitutes good cause for the Director to revoke approval of the plan.
EXAMPLE: Company E has an approved STC plan in place for its assembly unit. The plan calls for a 20% reduction in hours for the workers in the affected unit. At some point after the plan has been approved, Company E announces to the workers in its assembly unit that even though their hours of work had been reduced by 20%, the employer is setting production standards at a 10% reduction from the standards that were in place before the approval of the STC plan. In this case, with a revision of productivity standards that is not in proportion with the reduction of hours, the revision of the employer's productivity standards for the affected unit is unreasonable and shall constitute good cause for the Director to revoke approval of the STC plan.
EXAMPLE: Company F has in operation an approved STC plan for its affected warehouse unit. The plan calls for a 25% reduction in hours for the workers in the affected unit. The plan also calls for a temporary one-week shutdown between the Christmas and New Year holidays. After the workers in the affected unit return to work following the one-week shutdown, Company F lays off the two workers in the unit with the least seniority. The layoff of workers in the affected unit outside the temporary shutdown provided for in the plan defeats the intent and effective operation of the STC plan by failing to avoid layoffs, and constitutes good cause for the Director to revoke approval of the STC plan.
EXAMPLE: Company G has in operation an approved STC plan for its affected transportation unit. The plan calls for a 25% reduction in hours for the workers in the affected unit. However, Company G reduces the workers' hours by 27%. The reduction of the workers' hours by a percentage other than that stated in the plan is a violation of a criterion on which approval of the plan was based and constitutes good cause for the Director to revoke approval of the STC plan.
Ill. Admin. Code tit. 56, § 2870.25