Section 36-35-104 - Review of court rules - Criteria(1) As used in this section, "court rule" means a proposal for a court rule, a new court rule, or an existing court rule.(2) The committee may review and evaluate:(a) a submission of:(ii) a proposal for a court rule; and(b) an existing court rule.(3) If the committee chooses to conduct a review of a court rule as provided under Subsection (2), the review shall be based on the following criteria: (a) whether the court rule is authorized by the state constitution or by statute;(b) if authorized by statute, whether the court rule complies with legislative intent;(c) whether the court rule is in conflict with existing statute or governs a policy expressed in statute;(d) whether the court rule is primarily substantive or procedural in nature;(e) whether the court rule infringes on the powers of the executive or legislative branch of government;(f) the impact of the court rule on an affected person;(g) the purpose for the court rule, and if applicable, the reason for a change to an existing court rule;(h) the anticipated cost or savings due to the court rule to:(ii) local governments; and(i) the cost to an affected person of complying with the court rule.Amended by Chapter 178, 2024 General Session ,§ 12, eff. 5/1/2024.Renumbered from § 36-32-203 by Chapter 178, 2024 General Session ,§ 12, eff. 5/1/2024.Added by Chapter 154, 2020 General Session ,§ 23, eff. 5/12/2020.