No licensee or employee of a licensee shall:
The licensee is not in violation of this subsection if the licensee initiates oral contact with the debtor more than one time in an attempt to collect debts arising from the identified series of dishonored checks, automated clearinghouse transactions on a demand deposit account, or other preprinted written instruments when:
RCW 19.16.250
Reviser's note: This section was amended by 2019 c 201 s 2 and by 2019 c 227 s 4, each without reference to the other. Both amendments are incorporated in the publication of this section under RCW 1.12.025(2). For rule of construction, see RCW 1.12.025(1).
Findings-Intent- 2019 c 201 : "(1) The legislature finds and declares that:
(a) Due process requires that all defendants in court proceedings be provided with adequate notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard;
(b) Washington superior court civil rule 3 generally allows a plaintiff to serve a defendant with an unfiled summons and complaint. This superior court practice, known as "pocket service," is not allowed in Washington's courts of limited jurisdiction, including the district courts. Pocket service need not interfere with a defendant's due process rights if the defendant is represented by counsel or otherwise familiar with local legal procedural rules;
(c) In the debt collection context, however, many defendants are unfamiliar with the legal process, and most are unrepresented. When served with an unfiled, unnumbered summons and complaint, these defendants do not always realize that they must respond to the unfiled case, or know how to do so, to avoid a default judgment;
(d) In the debt collection context, many unrepresented defendants reasonably conclude that the unnumbered summons and complaint are not valid, particularly when they call the court and are told that no case has been filed. They then intentionally fail to answer and unwittingly give up their only opportunity to contest the debt;
(e) For these reasons, among others, a majority of defendants in debt collection cases filed in Washington superior courts fail to respond to the summons and complaint and, as a result, have default judgments entered against them.
(2) Therefore, the legislature intends to require that debt collection complaints be filed prior to service of the summons and complaint on defendants to ensure that defendants understand that it is an existing court case, are informed of the case number, and receive adequate notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond and be heard to avoid default judgment." [ 2019 c 201 s 1.]
Finding-Intent-2011 1st sp.s. c 29: "The legislature finds that a drafting error occurred in Substitute Senate Bill No. 5574 (2011 regular session) and section 1, chapter 57, Laws of 2011, resulting in the unintended deletion of a phrase in RCW 19.16.250. The intent of this legislation is to remedy that error, and retroactively apply this legislation to the effective date of section 1, chapter 57, Laws of 2011." [ 2011 1st sp.s. c 29 s 1.]
Effective date-2011 1st sp.s. c 29: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect July 22, 2011." [ 2011 1st sp.s. c 29 s 3.]
Effective date-2001 c 217 s 5: "Section 5 of this act takes effect April 1, 2004." [ 2001 c 217 s 16.]
Expiration date-2001 c 217 s 4: "Section 4 of this act expires April 1, 2004." [ 2001 c 217 s 15.]
Captions not law-2001 c 217: See note following RCW 9.35.005.