Current through the 2023 Regular Session
Section 39-29-102 - Point preference or alternative preference in initial hiring for certain applicants - substantially equivalent selection procedure(1) Subject to the restrictions in subsections (2) and (3), whenever a public employer uses a scored procedure, an applicant for an initial hiring, as defined in 39-30-103, must have added to the applicant's score the following percentage points of the total possible points that may be granted in the scored procedure: (a) 5 percentage points if the applicant is a veteran; and(b) 10 percentage points if the applicant is a disabled veteran or an eligible relative.(2) A veteran, disabled veteran, or eligible relative may not receive the percentage points provided for in subsection (1) unless the person: (a) is a United States citizen; and(b) meets the minimum qualifications required for the position. If no applicant meets the minimum qualifications and the public employer fills a training position, veterans' preference must be applied.(3) A disabled veteran who receives 10 percentage points under subsection (1)(b) may not receive an additional 5 percentage points under subsection (1)(a).(4) Whenever a public employer uses a selection procedure other than a scored procedure, the public employer shall give preference to a disabled veteran, a person with a disability, a veteran, an eligible relative as defined in 39-29-101, and an eligible spouse as defined in 39-30-103, in that order, over any nonpreferred applicant holding substantially equal qualifications, as defined in 39-30-103.(5) The preference under this section may include a guaranteed job interview for a veteran who meets the required qualifications for the position and has requested a preference, as provided in 39-29-103, if the public employer provides for a job interview preference by rule or ordinance. The guarantee of a job interview is not part of the preference claim that may be enforced as provided in 39-29-104.Amended by Laws 2013, Ch. 191, Sec. 1, eff. 10/1/2013.En. Sec. 2, Ch. 646, L. 1989; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 168, L. 1999.