HRS § 353-14
Denial of "gate money" where parole board determined that plaintiffs had no immediate needs satisfied rational basis test; thus, there was no equal protection violation. 940 F. Supp. 1523. Section (1987) provided Hawai`i paroling authority board [sic] with complete discretion to assess inmates' needs and to award "gate money" as necessary in light of those needs; thus, no protected property interest existed. The right to "gate money" not so fundamental as to warrant constitutional protection apart from its status under state law. 940 F. Supp. 1523. Where plaintiffs argued that State waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity through the enactment of this section and State's Tort Claims Act [sic], §§ 662-2 and 663-1, no express consent or applicable waiver provisions found. 940 F. Supp. 1523.