Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-72a
(P.A. 75-619, S. 5; P.A. 80-346, S. 1; P.A. 92-260, S. 33; P.A. 02-138, S. 8.)
Cited. 175 Conn. 315; 186 Conn. 45; 187 Conn. 216; 191 Conn. 604; 192 Conn. 154; 194 Conn. 258; 199 Conn. 121; 205 Conn. 352; Id., 386; 207 C. 403; 214 C. 89; 224 Conn. 656; 240 Conn. 743. Statute encompasses adopted relatives. 258 C. 779. Cited. 1 Conn.App. 724; 3 Conn.App. 374; 6 CA 15; 9 CA 631; judgment reversed, see 205 Conn. 352; Id., 648; 10 Conn.App. 591; 11 Conn.App. 102; 12 Conn.App. 585; 35 Conn.App. 173; 43 Conn.App. 715; 46 Conn.App. 741. Evidence was sufficient to support conviction and court properly instructed jury on element of intent for conviction of sexual assault in the third degree. 81 CA 189. Subsec. (a): Cited. 198 Conn. 147; 205 C. 27; 209 Conn. 416; 210 C. 244; 211 Conn. 18; 220 Conn. 400; 224 Conn. 397; 225 Conn. 519; 229 Conn. 580; Id., 557; 233 Conn. 502; 237 Conn. 284; Id., 576; Id., 694. Court's failure to define "knowledge" or to explain how it pertains to charge of sexual assault in the third degree did not violate defendant's due process rights where jury instructions, viewed as a whole, adequately informed jury of the elements of the crime. 258 Conn. 779. Subdiv. (2) does not violate equal protection clause of federal constitution because it applies equally to both opposite sex and same sex intercourse when individuals are related within certain degrees of kindred. 285 C. 528. Cited. 2 Conn.App. 333; 11 Conn.App. 236; 12 Conn.App. 221; 14 Conn.App. 244; 18 Conn.App. 273; Id., 694; 20 CA 530; 23 CA 221; Id., 564; judgment reversed in part, see 200 C. 400; 25 Conn.App. 653; judgment reversed, see 223 Conn. 52; Id., 725; 26 Conn.App. 395; 29 CA 724; 30 Conn.App. 281; 32 Conn.App. 217; judgment reversed, see 229 Conn. 580; 33 CA 743; judgment reversed, see 233 Conn. 502; 36 CA 228; 38 CA 100; Id., 762; 39 CA 657; Id., 742; 41 Conn.App. 139; Id., 287; 43 Conn.App. 578; 45 CA 756. Subdiv. (2) violates guarantees of equal protection because it proscribes heterosexual, but not homosexual, intercourse between kindred persons, and no rational basis exists for such distinction. 94 CA 667; judgment reversed, see 285 C. 498. Subdiv. (2): Jury instructions were proper as to essential element of sexual assault in the third degree when trial court directed jury to consider admission made by defendant that he was the stepfather of the victim. 110 CA 181. Subdiv. (2): Court could reasonably have found sufficient evidence to satisfy penetration element of sexual assault where both the child and defendant were wearing underwear. 148 Conn.App. 378.
See chapter 968a re address confidentiality program. See Sec. 53a-40c re sentence of psychological counseling for sexual assault of minor. See Sec. 54-86f re admissibility of evidence of prior sexual conduct. See Sec. 54-193a re statute of limitations for sexual abuse, exploitation or assault of minor.