Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-266j

Current with legislation from the 2024 Regular and Special Sessions.
Section 10-266j - Intercommunity programs for disadvantaged children
(a) For the purposes of this section: "Intercommunity programs for disadvantaged children" means educational programs or services designed to improve or accelerate the education of children whose educational achievement has been or is being restricted by economic, social or environmental disadvantages. "Receiving district" means the school district which accepts pupils from another school district in accordance with an agreement between it and one or more boards of education to provide an educational program for participating children which has been approved by the State Board of Education. "Sending district" means the school district responsible by law for the education of the children participating in such a program.
(b) Any local or regional board of education may make a binding written agreement with any other such board or group of such boards to implement intercommunity programs for children under this section. Such written agreement shall include mutually acceptable terms concerning, but not limited to, the tuition per child which shall be paid by the sending district to the receiving district.
(c) On and after July 1, 1998, the program established pursuant to this section for children residing in the Hartford school district shall operate in accordance with the provisions of section 10-266aa.

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-266j

(1967, P.A. 611, S. 1-4; P.A. 78-218, S. 189; P.A. 79-128, S. 9, 36; P.A. 84-224, S. 1, 2; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 91-7, S. 6, 22; P.A. 95-226, S. 25, 30; P.A. 96-178, S. 3, 18; P.A. 97-247, S. 17, 27; 97-290, S. 5, 29; 97-318, S. 9, 12; June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-11, S. 54, 65; P.A. 98-168, S. 25, 26.)

Cited. 187 Conn. 187; 195 Conn. 24. Extension of agreement made by Milford board of education with New Haven board of education pursuant to section is within administrative discretion of Milford school board and Milford board of aldermen was enjoined from holding an advisory referendum on extension as this would be an unlawful expenditure of city funds. 28 Conn.Supp. 207. Violates Art. I, Sec. 20 and Art. VIII, Sec. 1 of Connecticut Constitution. 31 Conn.Supp. 377.