It is professional misconduct for an LLLT to:
Wash. R. Limi. Lic. Leg. Tech. Pro. Cond. LLLT RPC 8.4
Comments
[1] This Rule was adapted from Lawyer RPC 8.4 with no substantive changes except as discussed in these Comments, and otherwise applies to LLLTs analogously.
[2] An LLLT holds a unique form of license to practice law. As a legal professional, an LLLT has a duty to uphold the integrity of the justice system and of those who are authorized to participate in it as judges, lawyers, and LLLTs. Rule 8.4(f)(1) prohibits an LLLT from knowingly assisting a judge or judicial officer in conduct that violates applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law. Rule 8.4(f)(2) adds a prohibition against knowingly assisting a lawyer in conduct that violates the Lawyer RPC or other law. Rule 8.4(f)(2) is substantially identical to Rule 8.4(f)(1) except for its reference to the applicable code of conduct and should be interpreted and applied analogously. Similarly, Rule 8.4(h) has been modified to reflect that an LLLT's obligation to avoid conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice extends to an LLLT's conduct toward lawyers.
[3] Lawyer Rule 8.4(m) pertains to lawyers who serve as judges. Judges in the judicial branch of the state of Washington must in nearly all instances be lawyers. Accordingly, because Rule 8.4(m) will have little or no applicability to LLLTs, it is reserved.
[4] LLLTs are subject to discipline when they violate or attempt to violate the LLLT RPC, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another, as when they require or instruct an agent to do so on the LLLT's behalf. In this way, LLLTs are held to the same standards that apply to lawyers. Rule 8.4(o), which does not appear in the Lawyer RPC, states that violating or attempting to violate APR 28(F-H) or Appendix APR 28 Regulation 2 is professional misconduct that subjects an LLLT to discipline.