Wash. R. Limi. Lic. Leg. Tech. Pro. Cond. LLLT RPC 1.0B
Comment
[1] Rule 1.0A was adapted from Lawyer RPC 1.0 with no substantive changes and applies to LLLTs analogously. Rule 1.0B adds terms that require definitions in light of the licensing of LLLTs as legal practitioners in Washington.
[2] The definition of the term "lawyer" is taken from APR 28(B). When used in the LLLTRPC, however, the term is used to denote a lawyer who is acting within the scope of the lawyer's license and in accordance with the Lawyer RPC. So, for example, the authorization in Rule 5.9 to enter into a law partnership with a lawyer requires that the lawyer is admitted and authorized to practice in the State of Washington.
[3] The terms "firm" and "law firm" are used interchangeably in the Lawyer RPC and also in these Rules. An LLLT should be cautious, however, in using the words "law firm" to describe a law practice that includes only LLLTs. The name and description of an LLLT's practice should not imply that a lawyer is associated with the firm unless that is the case. Any firm name used for an LLLT practice that does not include a lawyer must include the words "Legal Technician." See LLLT RPC 7.1 cmt. 2.