Vt. R. Civ. P. 79.1
Reporter's Notes-2023
Amendment Rule 79.1(e) is amended to make clear that admission pro hac vice is a matter of course on motion supported by the pro hac vice licensing card issued by the Court Administrator pursuant to A.O. 41, § 16. The card is issued on payment of fee and on the basis of the applicant's certification that the applicant is not suspended or disbarred in any jurisdiction and is in good standing and admitted to practice in the licensing state. The licensing card is sufficient to show the court where the case is pending that the applicant is in good standing and not subject to any discipline. The court retains control over the conduct of the out-of-state attorney and of the sponsoring attorney, whose signature is on the motion, and the court may revoke the admission for good cause. This amendment is made with contemporaneous amendment of identical provisions of V.R.Cr.P. 44.2(b), V.R.P.P. 79.1(d) and V.R.F.P. 15(a).
Reporter's Notes-2022 Amendment
Rule 79.1 is amended to clarify what is required from a self-represented party. The title of the rule is amended to indicate that it contains provisions related to self-represented parties. The headings of subdivisions (b), (c), and (d) are amended for clarity. Subdivision (b) is amended to make the contact information on a notice of appearance the same as for Rule 11(a).
Rule 79.1(d) requires self-represented parties to file and sign a Notice of Appearance for self-represented party, which is available on the judiciary website https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/sites/default/files/documents/100-00265.pdf The form contains contact information to facilitate both service by other parties and notice by the court. The form also allows self-represented parties to consent to receive service by email. Even where a self-represented party does not consent to email service, the party may be served using an email provided on a pleading if there is no known physical or postal address. This conforms to a contemporaneous amendment to Rule 5(b)(2)(B)(ii).
Rule 79.1(e) and (h)(4) are amended to replace the word "paper" with "document." Rule 5(i)(1) incorporates the broad definition of "document" from the 2020 Vermont Rules for Electronic Filing for purposes of filing and service.
Rule 79.1(i), which required attorneys to provide an eCabinet registration number, is deleted as obsolete.
Reporter's Notes-2020 Amendment
Rule 79.1(g) and (i) is amended to clarify that its cross references are to the 2010 Vermont Rules for Electronic filing.
Reporters Notes-2018 Amendment
Rule 79.1(e) is amended to comport with general revisions of Administrative Order No. 41, governing Licensing of Attorneys, effective May 15, 2017. In the revision and restyling of A.O. 41, former § 13, Admission Pro Hac Vice, is now designated as § 16 of A.O. 41.
Reporter's Notes-2018 Amendment
Rule 79.1(b) is amended to extend its 5-day time period to 7 days consistent with the simultaneous "day is a day" amendments to V.R.C.P. 6.
Reporter's Notes-2009 Amendment
Rule 79.1(h), permitting a lawyer acting pursuant to a limited representation agreement with a pro se client to enter a limited appearance in the Superior Court ("unbundling"), is now made permanent. The rule was originally adopted by order of February 6, 2006, effective April 14, 2006, for a period of two years, extended until April 10, 2009, by order of March 13, 2008. At the direction of the Supreme Court, the Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure inquired about use of the rule and, with the assistance of the Vermont Bar Association, conducted a survey of practice under it. While the survey reflected relatively little use of limited appearance, a significant number of lawyers who used the procedure found it helpful, and there have been no reports of problems in its use. The rule has proven effective in achieving its original purposes of providing assistance of lawyers to courts and litigants at critical stages in trials or other proceedings and encouraging lawyers to take on pro bono representation. See Reporter's Notes to 2006 amendment adopting the rule. It may be anticipated that greater familiarity with the rule and growing interest at the bar in providing pro bono representation will lead to increased use of the unbundling procedure.