Vt. Admin. Ord. Of. Sup. Ct. 3.7
Comment
[1] The activities permitted by paragraph (A) generally include those sponsored by or undertaken on behalf of public or private not-for-profit educational institutions, and other not-for-profit organizations, including law-related, charitable, and other organizations.
[2] Even for law-related organizations, a judge should consider whether the membership and purposes of the organization, or the nature of the judge's participation in or association with the organization, would conflict with the judge's obligation to refrain from activities that reflect adversely upon a judge's independence, integrity, and impartiality.
[3] Mere attendance at an event, whether or not the event serves a fundraising purpose, does not constitute a violation of paragraph (A)(4). It is also generally permissible for a judge to serve as an usher or a food server or preparer, or to perform similar functions, at fundraising events sponsored by educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organizations. Such activities are not solicitation and do not present an element of coercion or abuse the prestige of judicial office.
[4] Identification of a judge's position in educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organizations on letterhead used for fundraising or membership solicitation does not violate this Rule. The letterhead may list the judge's title or judicial office if comparable designations are used for other persons.
[5] In addition to appointing lawyers to serve as counsel for indigent parties in individual cases, a judge may promote broader access to justice by encouraging lawyers to participate in pro bono publico legal services, if in doing so the judge does not employ coercion or abuse the prestige of judicial office. Such encouragement may take many forms, including providing lists of available programs, training lawyers to do pro bono publico legal work, and participating in events recognizing lawyers who have done pro bono publico work.
Reporter's Notes
Rule 3.7 is based on Vermont Code 1994, Canon 4C(3), reorganized and expanded. Rule 3.7(A) expands coverage of the rule to all activity of a judge with a covered organization. Rule 3.7(A)(2) adds family members to those from whom a judge may solicit funds, but Rule 3.7(A)(3) and (4) limit membership solicitation and participation in fundraising events to law-related organizations. Rule 3.7(B), allowing judges to encourage lawyers to participate in pro bono activities, is new. The Comments are derived from the Commentary to ABA Code 1990, Canon 4C(3), adapted to address the reorganization and expansion embodied in Rule 3.7. New Comment [3] makes clear that minor activities in connection with fundraising events do not constitute a violation of Rule 3.7(A)(4). New Comment [5] expands on new Rule 3.7(B). See ABA Reporter's Explanation 121-26.