Tenn. R. Juv. P. 201
Advisory Commission Comments.
The 2016 amendment combines two previous rules regarding intake in and informal adjustment in delinquent and unruly cases. The intent of this rule is to allow local courts flexibility in how they handle informal adjustment, but also to spell out those basic procedures which must take place in every case in which informal adjustment is undertaken to ensure that informal adjustment is voluntary, as required in T.C.A § 37-1-110.
The requirement in subdivision (b) that the court representative accepting a complaint shall note thereon the date and time of receipt of the complaint has been added to ensure that complaints are reduced to writing and documentation exists as to when the complaint was received. The term "complaint" includes, but is not limited to, a petition or citation. The complaint may be filed with the clerk of the court or another person designated by the court. The term "complaint" as used in these rules is not equivalent to a complaint referenced in the Rules of Civil Procedure.
As part of the preliminary inquiry, subdivision (c) requires the designated court officer to notify the child of the child's right to an attorney at the beginning of the interview with the child. T.C.A. § 37-1-126 provides that a child is entitled to be represented by an attorney in any delinquent proceeding. A child is entitled to an attorney when charged with an unruly offense when the child is in jeopardy of being removed from the home pursuant to T.C.A. § 37-1-132(b). Not all children charged with an unruly offense are entitled to an attorney. The right attaches when the child is in jeopardy of being placed outside the child's home with a person, agency or facility. Prior to placing custody of an unruly child with the Department of Children's Services, the court is obligated to refer the child to the Department's juvenile-family crisis intervention program pursuant to T.C.A. § 37-1-168. A child's assertion of the right to counsel should not preclude an informal adjustment when appropriate.
It should be noted that, although attitude may be a factor under subdivision (d)(1)(iv) to consider in determining whether to undertake informal adjustment, it should not be the sole basis for denying informal adjustment. Each locality is encouraged to adopt and implement standardized risk and needs assessment tools in order to assist in this process.
In many instances, the child or the child's family may desire to pay the alleged victim for any harm done. If the child and the victim agree to restitution, this can be done independently of the informal adjustment.
Subdivision(e) provides that when an informal adjustment is determined to be inappropriate then formal court proceedings shall commence with the filing of a petition or citation. If a petition has not been filed at this point in time, then such petition should be filed with the clerk of the court. If a citation has been filed that meets the requirements of T.C.A. § 40-7-118, then a petition need not be filed in order to commence formal proceedings. If an informal adjustment is determined to be inappropriate, the designated court officer should assess whether a pretrial diversion is appropriate.
Courts should develop written local procedures and criteria for initiating informal adjustments. Such criteria might include a listing of the types of cases, or charges, which might be handled by informal adjustment. Local rules should include a process by which the district attorney general, petitioner, or victim of the offense may object to an informal adjustment.
Advisory Commission Comments [2017].
The rule is amended by deleting the last sentence of subdivision 201(d)(3). That sentence (which provided, "The process shall only include counsel and advice, or referral to an agency available in the community for successful completion of a suitable treatment program, class or some form of alternative dispute resolution") was intended to have been deleted in the comprehensive revision of the Rules of Juvenile Procedure effective July 1, 2016, but was inadvertently included in the revision.
Additionally, the fifth paragraph of the original Advisory Commission Comment is amended by deleting references to subdivision 201(d)(3), which also should have been removed in the comprehensive revision of the Rules of Juvenile Procedure
Advisory Commission Comment [2019 Amendment]
Rule 201 is amended by adding the words "or citation" to subsections (a)(1)(B) and (a)(2) as Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-115(c) specifically provides for the issuance of a citation in certain cases, after the passage of 2018 Tenn. Pub. Acts, ch. 1052, § 12. Subsections (d)(1) and (d)(3) are amended to conform to Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-110(a)(2) and (d) (2018 Tenn. Pub. Acts, ch. 1052, §§ 10-11 (effective July 1, 2018)). Subdivision (f) is amended by deleting the word "any" and substituting "the delinquent or unruly subject" before the word "proceeding" to clarify the original intent of the rule that statements made by the child during the preliminary inquiry or informal adjustment are not admissible prior to the dispositional hearing in the subject case only.