Sch. Cnty. Pa. 1001.0
Comment: Parties and their attorneys are encouraged to use mediation as a means to bring disputes to conclusion economically and expeditiously. While mediation is voluntary, the Court may feel strongly that the use of mediation will conclude pending litigation. Parties and their attorneys are urged to accept the advice of the Court when mediation is suggested as a means to resolve the case. The Court may recommend that the parties in any civil case, except protection from abuse matters, utilize mediation or other alternative dispute resolution processes, including, but not necessarily limited to, services offered by the Alternative Dispute Resolution Program as administered through the Schuylkill County Bar Association whenever it appears to the judge presiding in such case that mediation or other alternative dispute resolution processes are likely to resolve the case. An issue may arise regarding insurance policies, and particularly professional negligence policies, wherein ultimate approval of a settlement rests with the insured. The use of mediation may lead parties to evaluate their positions and achieve a mutually acceptable resolution. This rule cannot rewrite an insurance contract, but participation in mediation may educate all interests with respect to the merits of resolving a pending dispute without protracted litigation. All parties should come to the mediation process with appropriate motivations. The process should be used in good faith; for example, it should not be used as an alternative means for discovery. It is anticipated that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court may enact rules directing certain types of cases to use alternative dispute resolution processes, including mediation, as a prerequisite step for certification prior to trial. This rule is adopted in anticipation of such and will be amended to comply with the mandates of any future rules adopted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.