Ohio. R. Superi. Ct. 65
Commentary (October 1, 1997)
This rule is analogous to former C.P. Sup. R. 33 and has been amended to be inclusive and to apply to all land sale proceedings. Former C.P. Sup. R. 33(A) only applied to public land sale, and not private land sale proceedings. The rule has been amended to require that evidence of title prepared by a title company must be prepared by a title company that is licensed in the State of Ohio.
Former C.P. Sup R. 33(B) has been amended to delete the requirement of giving notice by posting the notice of sale upon the premises. This appeared unnecessary since actual notice of the sale must be given to all defendants, and R.C. 2127.32 requires notice by publication to the general public.
Reference to the filing of an affidavit has been amended to refer to a "certificate," to reflect Civil Rule 73(H), which does not require certificates and pleadings to be under oath. An affidavit, by definition, is under oath. The content of the "certificate" has been amended to comply with the amended notice requirements of division (B).
Former C.P. Sup. R. 33(C) has been deleted in that the requirements are unnecessary and adequately covered by R.C. 2127.23 and 2127.35.
Amended division (C) requires that a proposed closing statement be attached to the order of confirmation of sale issued pursuant to R.C. 2127.35. The inclusion of the proposed closing statement provides the court with the details of the costs associated with the land sale proceedings.
Division (D) has been amended in order to be made gender neutral. No substantive changes have been made.