Ohio. R. Superi. Ct. 62
Commentary (October 1, 1997)
The rule is analogous to former C.P. Sup. R. 30. The title of Sup. R. 62 has been amended to be more inclusive and descriptive. R.C. 2117.06 neither limits nor requires that claims be filed with the court. Filing with the court is merely one alternative pursuant to R.C. 2117.06(A)(2).
The last sentence of former C.P. Sup. R. 30(A) has been deleted because the issue is adequately addressed by R.C. 2117.06(I).
The statutory reference in Sup. R. 62(B) has been deleted as limiting the former rule. Insolvency hearings have been added to the requirement of Sup. R. 62(B). There is no statutory provisions regarding advising the court of the specific claims in an insolvent estate. The court requires this information and the rule supplements this void.