In addition to local rules of practice adopted pursuant to division (A)(1) of this rule and any other Rule of Superintendence, each court or division of a court, as applicable, shall adopt the following by local rule:
Ohio. R. Superi. Ct. 5
Commentary (July 1, 1997)
This rule consolidates several former provisions relating to the adoption of local rules of court. Division (A)(1) recognizes the rule-making authority granted to local courts by Article IV, Section 5(B) of the Ohio Constitution. Division (A)(2) incorporates provisions of the rules of practice and procedure adopted by the Supreme Court that mandate notice and an opportunity to comment prior to the adoption of local rules of court. See the following rules and accompanying 1994 staff notes: Rule 83(B) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 57(A)(2) of the Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure; Rule 45(A) of the Ohio Rules of Juvenile Procedure; and Rule 31(B) of the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Division (B) incorporates and modifies the former requirement that a court or division file local rules upon adoption with the clerk of the Supreme Court. Division (C) contains a new requirement that each court and division annually file a complete set of its local rules with the clerk of the Supreme Court or certify that there were no changes to the local rules in the prior calendar year. Together with the requirement that local rules be filed with the Supreme Court upon adoption, this provision will ensure that the Supreme Court has a current, comprehensive set of local rules adopted by each court or division.
Division (D) retains two former requirements that courts and divisions adopt case management and jury management plans as local rules of court. While each court and division must have a case management plan, the requirement of a jury management plan applies only to those courts or divisions that use juries in the hearing and disposition of cases.
Court Security Plans
The former requirement that each court adopt a security plan has been moved to Rule 9 since the plans no longer are required to be included in local rules of court.