The prosecuting attorney's filing of either a notice of intent to pursue or a statement of an interest in pursuing a serious youthful offender sentence shall constitute good cause for continuing the adjudicatory hearing date and extending detention or shelter care.
The hearing of a removal action shall be scheduled in accordance with Juv. R. 39(B).
If the complaint alleges abuse, neglect, or dependency, the hearing shall be held no later than thirty days after the complaint is filed. For good cause shown, the adjudicatory hearing may extend beyond thirty days either for an additional ten days to allow any party to obtain counsel or for a reasonable time beyond thirty days to obtain service on all parties or complete any necessary evaluations. However, the adjudicatory hearing shall be held no later than sixty days after the complaint is filed.
The failure of the court to hold an adjudicatory hearing within any time period set forth in this rule does not affect the ability of the court to issue any order otherwise provided for in statute or rule and does not provide any basis for contesting the jurisdiction of the court or the validity of any order of the court.
The court may hear testimony, review documents, or make further inquiry, as it considers appropriate, or it may proceed directly to the action required by division (F) of this rule.
Ohio. Juv. R. 29
Staff Note (July 1, 2004 Amendment)
Juvenile Rule 29(A) Scheduling the hearing
Division (A) was amended to conform the language of the rule to R.C. 2151.28, as amended effective May 16, 2002.
Juvenile Rule 29(B) Advisement and findings at the commencement of the hearing
Division (C) was amended to conform the language of the rule to R.C. 2151.10 and 2151.12, which allow the transfer of juveniles age fourteen and over to adult court for trial.
Staff Note (July 1, 2001 Amendment)
Juvenile Rule 29 Adjudicatory Hearing
Juvenile Rule 29(A) Scheduling the hearing
Rule 29(A) was amended to conform to Revised Code section 2152.13(B), which provides that the prosecuting attorney has twenty days after a child's initial appearance in juvenile court within which to file a notice of intent to pursue a serious youthful offender dispositional sentence. The rule preserves the ten-day time period within which to hold an adjudicatory hearing for all other cases in which the child is in detention or shelter care. However, because the rule contemplates a hearing within ten days, but the statute grants a twenty-day time period for making the charging decision, the amended rule also provides a mechanism by which a prosecuting attorney can preserve the twenty-day time period by filing a "statement of interest in pursuing a serious youthful offender sentence." The amended rule states that either the notice of intent (i.e., a Rule 22(D)(5) motion) or a statement of interest shall be good cause for extending both the date for an adjudicatory hearing and detention or shelter care. If the prosecuting attorney does not file a notice of intent to pursue a serious youthful offender sentence before the twenty-day time period lapses, the ordinary juvenile time frames again become operative. If the prosecuting attorney does not obtain an indictment or information, or the court denies the Rule 22(D)(5) motion, the ordinary juvenile time frames will again become operative. If the child is determined to be eligible for a serious youthful offender sentence, the ordinary juvenile time frames do not apply. Instead, adult time frames, i.e., speedy trial provisions, become operative [Revised Code section 2152.13(D)(1)] .
Juvenile Rule 29(C) Entry of admission or denial
Rule 29(C) was amended in response to Section 3 of Sub. Sen. Bill 179 (effective January 1, 2002), in which the General Assembly encouraged the Supreme Court to amend Rule 29(C) to permit "no contest" pleas with the consent of the court, similar to the provisions in Criminal Rule 11.
Juvenile Rule 29(F) Procedure upon determination of the issues
Rule 29(F) was amended in response to both the chronic and habitual truancy act and the serious youthful offender act. Divisions (F)(1) and (2) include recognition that a serious youthful offender case will proceed by indictment or information. Division (F)(2) also recognizes that certain dispositions within the power of the juvenile court may be precluded by statute for certain types of cases. The amendment removes any perception of conflict between statutorily authorized dispositions and those authorized in the rule. Specifically, the division conforms to Revised Code section 2152.13(E), which controls the dispositions in serious youthful offender cases. The division also recognizes that chronic or habitual truant dispositions are heavily regulated by statute.