Opinions shall set forth the reasoning in support of the decision in a way that does not directly or indirectly compromise the anonymity of the appellant. Opinions written in compliance with this requirement shall be considered public records available upon request. If, in the judgment of the court, it is impossible to release an opinion without compromising the anonymity of the appellant, the entry that journalizes the outcome of the case shall include a specific finding that no opinion can be written without disclosing the identity of the appellant. Such finding shall be a matter of public record. It is the obligation of the court to remove any and all information in its opinion that would directly or indirectly disclose the identity of the appellant.
If appellant believes that this opinion may disclose her identity, appellant has the right to appear and argue at a hearing before this court. Appellant may perfect this right to a hearing by filing a motion for a hearing within fourteen days of the date of this opinion.
The clerk is instructed that this opinion is not to be made available for release until either of the following:
Notice shall be provided by mailing a copy of the opinion to the attorney for the appellant or, if she is not represented, to the address provided by appellant for receipt of notice.
Ohio. App. R. 11.2
Staff Note (July 1, 2015 amendment)
App. R. 11.2 lists various categories of expedited appeals that are entitled to priority over other appeals. The categories are amended to include prosecutorial appeals from suppression orders under Crim. R. 12(K) and Juv. R. 22(F), both of which provide for priority disposition.
Staff Note (July 1, 2001 Amendment)
Appellate Rule 11.2 Expedited Appeals
The amendment to App. R. 11.2 effective July 1, 2001 incorporated into one rule provisions for expedited appeals that previously had been in App. R. 7(C), App. R. 11.2, and Sup. R. 23(F) and 25. It provides that appeals in three categories of cases are to be expedited and given priority over all other civil, criminal, and administrative appeals. The first of the three categories includes cases concerning abortion- related appeals from juvenile courts. Sup. R. 23(F) and 25 address appeals of such cases. The second includes cases concerning adoption and termination of parental rights. App. R. 11.2 addressed appeals of such cases. The third includes cases concerning dependent, abused, neglected, unruly, or delinquent children. Prior to its amendment also effective July 1, 2001, App. R. 7(C) addressed appeals of such cases. To reflect the expanded scope of this rule, the title of the rule was changed from "Adoption and Parental Rights Appeals."
As amended, App. R. 11.2 also establishes a hierarchy among the three categories of cases. Abortion-related appeals from juvenile courts are to have the highest priority. Appeals of cases concerning adoption and termination of parental rights have priority over all cases except cases concerning abortion without parental consent. Appeals of cases concerning dependent, abused, neglected, unruly, or delinquent children are to have priority over all cases except cases concerning abortion without parental consent and cases concerning adoption and termination of parental rights.
App. R. 11.2(B)(1) - (8) generally recite the language of Sup. Rule 25(A) - (G) with two exceptions. The first exception is that the last sentence of App. R. 11.2(B)(3)(b) incorporates the last sentence of Sup. R. 23(F)(2). The second is that App. R. 11.2(B)(4) omits the last portion of Sup. R. 25(C), which states that papers and records in the appeal "are not public records under section 149.43 of the Revised Code."
Staff Note (July 1, 2000 Amendment)
Rule 11.2 Adoption and Parental Rights Appeals
In 1997, the federal government enacted the Adoption and Safe Families Act that reduces the length of time to find permanent homes for children who have been removed from their birth parents. In March 1999, Am. Sub. H.B. 484 of the 122nd General Assembly (Ohio's Adoption and Safe Families Act) became effective. The legislation was intended to accelerate the judicial process of finding permanent homes for children removed from their birth parents. It did not address the delays inherent in appeals of orders in that process.
This new rule addresses appeals of orders granting or denying adoptions of minors and terminations of parental rights, and provides for these cases to have priority in the courts of appeals.