N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. & Ord. 35
Under N.D. Const. art. VI, § 3, the supreme court has the authority to adopt rules of procedure to be followed by all courts of the state, and to establish the powers, duties, and qualifications of court officials. The supreme court has administrative responsibility over all courts of the state and may establish rules to exercise that administrative authority as it considers necessary or desirable (N.D.C.C. § 27-02-05.1).
It is the intent of the North Dakota judicial system to establish a mechanism for the development of administrative policies and procedures which will define the mission of juvenile court services consistent with the Juvenile Court Act, N.D.C.C. chs. 27-20.2, 27- 20.3, and 27-20.4, and ch. 27-20.1 on guardianship of a child; to provide the administrative mechanism and authority to ensure the implementation of the policies; and to ensure the full involvement of judges and personnel of the North Dakota judicial system in the development of such policies and procedures.
The administrative policies adopted by the supreme court under this rule govern the actions of the juvenile courts and personnel of the juvenile courts in North Dakota.
The juvenile policy board will consist of three district judges appointed by the North Dakota judges' association, one district judge and one judicial referee appointed by the administrative council, one district judge or supreme court justice appointed by the chief justice, one juvenile court officer appointed by the chief justice and one juvenile director appointed by the chief justice. Terms of the members will be for a three-year period and will be staggered in such a manner to ensure that at least two members are up for election or appointment annually. A member may not serve more than three consecutive terms. A former member who served three consecutive terms is eligible for reappointment after a six-year break in service. The chief justice may appoint members to fill vacancies which occur for an unexpired term. The membership will reflect the geographic and population diversities of the state and no more than two judges may be from any one judicial district.
Prior to the end of the first fiscal year of each biennium, the juvenile policy board will review data compiled by the juvenile court coordinator. After the review, the juvenile policy board will provide recommendations for the delivery of services, identify program needs, recommend cooperative agreements with other state, local or private agencies, and may recommend specific budget items to be included in the judicial system budget request.
The juvenile policy board may issue operating procedures and guidelines to be followed by the juvenile courts in implementing state law or administrative policies which will be forwarded to the supreme court for consideration.
It is also the intent to ensure the consistent juvenile court practice, delivery of programs and services through the policy board and the state juvenile services coordinator (or such other person within the state court administrator's office assigned the juvenile portfolio regardless of title).
The state juvenile services coordinator will have the responsibility and authority to assure implementation of policies as approved by the supreme court and procedures approved by the board. The coordinator will work with the juvenile courts on a statewide basis and on an individual basis to assure implementation. The coordinator will make recommendations and reports to the judges of the district courts, the policy board, or the supreme court in matters relating to budget, staffing, personnel, programs, performance and other related matters.
N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. & Ord. 35
SOURCES: Juvenile Policy Board Minutes of December 8, 2023. N.D.Const., Art. VI, § 3; N.D.C.C. chs. 27-20.1, 27-20.2, 27-20.3, 27-20.4, and § 27-02-05.1.
Section 4 was amended, effective 2/15/2024, to update the procedure for providing recommendations relating to the delivery of juvenile court services.
Section 5(a)(2) was amended, effective 2/15/2024, to include guardianships.
Section 5(c), which required notice of a proposed policy or procedure to district court judges and appropriate personnel, was deleted, effective 2/15/2024.