Rule 806 - Attacking and Supporting the Declarant's CredibilityWhen a hearsay statement, or a statement described in Rule 801(d)(2)(C), (D), or (E), has been admitted in evidence, the declarant's credibility may be attacked, and then supported, by any evidence that would be admissible for those purposes if the declarant had testified as a witness. The court may admit evidence of the declarant's inconsistent statement or conduct, regardless of when it occurred or whether the declarant had an opportunity to explain or deny it. If the party against whom the statement was admitted calls the declarant as a witness, the party may examine the declarant on the statement as if on cross-examination.
EXPLANATORY NOTE Rule 806 was amended, effective 3/1/1990;3/1/2014. Rule 806 treats a declarant of hearsay evidence as any other witness by allowing the declarant's credibility to be attacked in accordance with the rules. One deviation is required, however, and that is that a declarant need not have been given an opportunity to deny or explain a statement inconsistent with the hearsay statement. This is because the inconsistent statement may well have been subsequent to the hearsay statement offered in evidence, precluding bringing it to the declarant's attention. Rule 806 was amended, effective 3/1/1990. The amendments are technical in nature and no substantive change is intended. Rule 806 was amended, effective3/1/2014, in response to the12/1/2011, revision of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The language and organization of the rule were changed to make the rule more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. There is no intent to change any result in any ruling on evidence admissibility. SOURCES: Joint Procedure Committee Minutes of9/27/2012, page 26; March 24-25, 1988, page 12;12/3/1987, page 15;4/8/1976, page 13;10/1/1975, page 8. Fed.R.Ev. 806; Rule 806, SBAND proposal. N.D.R.Ev. 607 (Who May Impeach a Witness), N.D.R.Ev. 608 (A Witness's Character for Truthfulness or Untruthfulness), N.D.R.Ev. 609 (Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction), N.D.R.Ev. 613 (Witness's Prior Statement).