N.M. R. Crim. P. Metro. Ct. 7-203
Committee commentary. - When a defendant has been arrested without a warrant and remains in custody, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires a judicial determination of probable cause within forty-eight hours after arrest. See Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103 (1975) (holding that any significant pretrial restraint on liberty requires a prompt judicial determination of probable cause); Cnty. of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 56 (1991) (holding that a judicial determination "of probable cause within 48 hours of arrest will, as a general matter, comply with the promptness requirement of Gerstein").
A probable cause determination proceeding is not to be confused with a first appearance hearing, see Rule 7-501 NMRA, or a preliminary examination, see Rule 7-202 NMRA. The determination of probable cause can be made in a nonadversarial proceeding and may be held in the absence of the defendant and of counsel. See Gerstein, 420 U.S. at 119-22 (concluding that a probable cause determination does not need to be "accompanied by the full panoply of adversary safeguards - counsel, confrontation, cross-examination, and compulsory process for witnesses"). The probable cause determination is required only to assure in warrantless arrest cases that there is probable cause to detain the defendant.
Prior to amendments in 2013, Paragraph C of this rule required the court to dismiss the complaint without prejudice if the court found no probable cause. However, as explained supra, the sole purpose of a probable cause determination is to decide "whether there is probable cause for detaining the arrested person pending further proceedings." Gerstein, 420 U.S. at 120 (emphasis added). Accordingly, in 2013, this rule was amended to clarify that a court should not dismiss the criminal complaint against the defendant merely because the court has found no probable cause. Failure to make a probable cause determination does not void a subsequent conviction. See Gerstein, 420 U.S. at 119.
[Adopted by Supreme Court Order No. 13-8300-042, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2013.]
ANNOTATIONS The 2018 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 18-8300-024, effective February 1, 2019, authorized the court to set conditions of release immediately upon finding probable cause that the defendant committed an offense; in Subparagraph C(2), added the first sentence, after "bailable offense, the court", deleted "shall" and added "may", after "may set conditions of release", deleted "in accordance with" and added "immediately or within the time required under", and deleted "If the court finds that there is probable cause the court shall make such finding in writing.". The 2017 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 17-8300-016, effective December 31, 2017, provided that when a defendant is released following a court finding that the complaint failed to establish probable cause to believe that the defendant committed a criminal offense, the defendant's release shall be subject only to the conditions that the defendant shall appear before the court as directed and shall not violate any federal, state, or local criminal law; and in Subparagraph C(1), after "release of the defendant from custody pending", deleted "trial" and added the remainder of the subparagraph. The 2013 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 13-8300-042, effective December 31, 2013, provided that the time limit on the extension of time for making a probable cause determination includes Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays; required the personal recognizance release of the defendant from custody pending trial if no probable cause is found; in Paragraph A, added the third sentence; in Paragraph C, Subparagraph (1), added the title, after "the court shall", deleted "dismiss the complaint without prejudice and", after "order the immediate", added "personal recognizance", and after "release of the defendant", added the remainder of the sentence; and in Subparagraph (2), added the title. The 1991 amendment, effective for cases filed in the metropolitan courts on or after November 1, 1991, in Paragraph A, substituted "promptly, but in any event within forty-eight (48) hours" for "within a reasonable time, but in any event within twenty-four (24) hours" in the second sentence and deleted the former last sentence, relating to expiration of the prescribed period on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. The 1990 amendment, effective for cases filed in the metropolitan courts on or after September 1, 1990, rewrote this rule.
For probable cause determination form, see Rule 9-207A NMRA. For statement of probable cause, see Rule 9-215 NMRA.