A.During investigation.(1) Disciplinary counsel, at any stage of an investigation after the respondent-attorney has been notified of the investigation, may serve interrogatories on the respondent-attorney. Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated in lieu of an answer. The answers are to be signed by the person making them. The respondent-attorney shall serve a copy of the answers and objections, if any, to the office of disciplinary counsel within thirty (30) days after service of the interrogatories. The chair of the Disciplinary Board may allow a shorter or longer time in which to file answers upon a motion filed by either the respondent-attorney or disciplinary counsel within ten (10) days of service of the interrogatories on the respondent-attorney. The interrogatory answers may be used by disciplinary counsel at any future hearings in the investigation.(2) Disciplinary counsel at any stage of an investigation after the respondent-attorney has been notified of the investigation, may request or invite the respondent-attorney to appear before a reviewing officer and answer questions related to allegations under investigation by disciplinary counsel. The invitation or request shall be accompanied by a statement from disciplinary counsel describing the allegations being investigated and the areas about which the respondent-attorney will be asked to comment. At an appearance before a reviewing officer, the respondent-attorney has a right to the presence of counsel, the right to make opening and closing statements and the right to introduce documentary evidence. A taped record will be made of the respondent-attorney's responses, a copy of which will be provided to the respondent-attorney. (3) Upon a showing of good cause, the chair of the Disciplinary Board, at any stage of the investigation after the respondent-attorney has been notified of the investigation, may issue a subpoena for the production of records and other documents of the respondent-attorney or any other witness necessary to the investigation as well as for requiring the presence and testimony of witnesses or the respondent-attorney under oath. The respondent-attorney shall have notice of the subpoena, shall have the right to be present and cross-examine witnesses and shall have the right to be accompanied by counsel.(4) If it appears that the respondent-attorney or a witness may alter, destroy, secrete or remove from the jurisdiction of this state any books, records, documents or other evidence relevant or material to an investigation, at any stage of the investigation, disciplinary counsel, if authorized by the Disciplinary Board, may petition the Supreme Court for an order to compel the attendance of witnesses before a hearing committee and the production before a hearing committee of any books, records, documents or other evidence relevant or material to an investigation before notifying the respondent-attorney. The petition shall contain or have attached a sworn written statement of facts showing probable cause to believe that the records may be altered, destroyed, secreted or removed from the State of New Mexico. Any and all proceedings before the Supreme Court pursuant to this subparagraph shall be conducted in camera and shall be kept under the seal of the Supreme Court. B.Formal disciplinary proceedings. At request of either disciplinary counsel or the respondent-attorney, the chair of a hearing committee may issue subpoenas: (1) requiring the presence of a witness at a deposition for discovery that has been authorized pursuant to Rule 17-311 NMRA and that, if so authorized, may command the witness to produce the designated books, papers, documents or tangible things;(2) requiring the person to whom the subpoena is directed to produce and permit inspection and copying of designated books, documents or tangible things in the possession, custody or control of that person, or to permit inspection of premises at a specified time and place. A command to produce evidence or to permit inspection may be joined with a command to appear at a hearing or at deposition, or may be issued separately;(3) requiring the presence of witnesses at a formal hearing before a hearing committee or the Disciplinary Board;(4) commanding the person to whom it is directed to produce at a formal hearing before a hearing committee the books, papers, documents or tangible things designated therein.C.Contents. No subpoena shall be issued pursuant to this rule unless it sets forth: (1) the reason or purpose for the investigation or hearing;(2) with reasonable definiteness, any records or other documents to be produced which are relevant to the investigation or hearing;(3) a statement that the witness has a right to be accompanied by counsel; and(4) the date, time and place at which the witness is to appear.D.Enforcement.(1) Failure to cooperate with an investigation of the Disciplinary Board, or failure to respond to letters from disciplinary counsel regarding an investigation shall be grounds for submission of a motion to the Supreme Court to order that the offending respondent-attorney be held in contempt of court.(2) Any person who has been served with a subpoena pursuant to this rule may apply to the officer issuing the subpoena for an order to quash the subpoena. If any person fails to comply with a subpoena issued by the chair of the Disciplinary Board or the chair of a hearing committee in accordance with the provisions of this rule or refuses to take the oath or affirmation as a witness or thereafter refuses to be examined, at the request of the officer issuing the subpoena, disciplinary counsel may apply to the Supreme Court for an order directing that person to take the requisite action. The Supreme Court may issue such order or may quash the subpoena. Should any person willfully fail to comply with an order of the Supreme Court, the Court may punish such person for contempt of court.E.Subpoena; request of another jurisdiction. For good cause shown, the chair of the Disciplinary Board, or a member of the board designated by the chair, may issue a subpoena to compel the attendance of witnesses and production of documents in this state for use in lawyer disciplinary or disability proceedings in another jurisdiction. The subpoena may be requested by disciplinary counsel of this state when the request is by the disciplinary authority of the other jurisdiction, by an attorney admitted to practice in this state when the request is by a respondent in a proceeding in another jurisdiction, or by a respondent in a proceeding in another jurisdiction acting pro se. The person seeking the subpoena shall certify that the subpoena has been approved or authorized under the law or disciplinary rules of the other jurisdiction. Service, enforcement and challenges to a subpoena issued pursuant to this paragraph shall be in accordance with the Rules Governing Discipline. N.M. R. Gov. Disc. 17-306
As amended, effective 8/31/1995;1/3/2006; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-008, effective 4/5/2012. ANNOTATIONS The 2012 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 12-8300-008, effective April 5, 2012, required a showing of good cause of the issuance of a subpoena of witnesses or for the production of records and documents; in Paragraph A, in Subparagraph (3), at the beginning of the first sentence, added "Upon a showing of good cause"; and in Paragraph E, at the beginning of the first sentence, added "For good cause shown", and in the second sentence, after "by a respondent in a proceeding in another jurisdiction", added the remainder of the sentence. The 2006 amendment, approved by Supreme Court Order No. 06-8300-001, effective January 3, 2006, limited the applicability of Paragraph B to formal disciplinary hearings, added new Subparagraphs (1) and (2) of Paragraph B relating to the issuance of subpoenas for discovery purposes, redesignated former Subparagraphs (1) and (2) of Paragraph B as Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of Paragraph B and deleted the second sentence in each of these subparagraphs, added Subparagraph (4) of Paragraph C, amended Subparagraph (2) of Paragraph D to provide for the filing of an application to quash a subpoena with the officer issuing the subpoena rather than the Supreme Court and added new Paragraph E relating to the request of another jurisdiction for a subpoena to compel the attendance of witnesses and documents for use in a disciplinary proceeding. The 1995 amendment, effective October 1, 1995, in Paragraph A, added Subparagraph (1) and redesignated the remaining subparagraphs accordingly, substituted "respondent-attorney" for "attorney" throughout the paragraph, inserted "after the respondent-attorney has been notified of an investigation" in the first sentence of Subparagraph (2) and rewrote the second sentence of Subparagraph (2), rewrote Subparagraph (3), and substituted "Disciplinary Board" for "board" in Subparagraph (4); substituted "counsel" for "an attorney" in Subparagraph B(3); substituted "disciplinary counsel" for "bar counsel" and "respondent-attorney" for "attorney" in Subparagraph D(1); and substituted "chair" for "chairman" and deleted "chief" preceding "disciplinary counsel" throughout the rule.
See Rule 1-045 NMRA for issuance of subpoenas pursuant to the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts.