N.H. R. Evid. 803

As amended through September 26, 2024
Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay - Regardless of Whether the Declarant is Available as a Witness

The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness:

(1)Present Sense Impression

A statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant perceiveed it.

(2)Excited Utterance

A statement relating to a startling event or condition, made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement that it caused.

(3)Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition

A statement of the declarant's then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent or plan), or emotional, sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the validity or terms of the declarant's will.

(4) Statement Made for Medical Diagnosis or Treatment. A statement that:
(A) is made for - and is reasonably pertinent to - medical diagnosis or treatment;
(B) describes medical history; past or present symptoms or sensations; their inception; or their general cause; and
(C) the court affirmatively finds were made under circumstances indicating their trustworthiness
(5)Recorded Recollection A record that:
(A) is on a matter the witness once knew about but now cannot recall well enough to testify fully and accurately;
(B) was made or adopted by the witness when the matter was fresh in the witness's memory; and
(C) accurately reflects the witness's knowledge.

If admitted, the record may be read into evidence or played before a jury but may be received as an exhibit only if offered by an adverse party.

(6)Records of a Regularly Conducted Activity. A record of an act, event, condition, opinion, or diagnosis if:
(A) the record was made at or near the time by - or from information transmitted by - someone with knowledge;
(B) the record was kept in the course of a regularly conducted activity of a business, organization, occupation, or calling, whether or not for profit;
(C) making the record was a regular practice of that activity;
(D) all these conditions are shown by the testimony of the custodian or another qualified witness, or by a certification that complies with Rule 902(11) or (12) or with a statute permitting certification; and
(E) neither the source of information nor the method or circumstances of preparation indicate a lack of trustworthiness.
(7)Absence of a Record of a Regularly Conducted Activity. Evidence that a matter is not included in a record described in paragraph (6) if:
(A) the evidence is admitted to prove that the matter did not occur or exist;
(B) a record was regularly kept for a matter of that kind; and
(C) neither the possible source of the information nor other circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness.
(8)Public Records. A record or statement of a public office if:
(A) it sets out:
(i) the office's activities;
(ii) a matter observed while under a legal duty to report, but not including, in a criminal case, a matter observed by law-enforcement personnel; or
(iii) in a civil case or against the government in a criminal case, factual findings from a legally authorized investigation; and
(B) neither the source of information nor other circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness.
(9)Public Records of Vital Statistics. A record of a birth, death, or marriage, if reported to a public office in accordance with a legal duty.
(10)Absence of a Public Record. Testimony - or a certification under Rule 902 - that a diligent search failed to disclose a public record or statement if the testimony or certification is admitted to prove that:
(A) the record or statement does not exist; or
(B) a matter did not occur or exist, if a public office regularly kept a record or statement for a matter of that kind.

This exception shall apply only if neither the possible source of the information nor other circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness.

(11)Records of Religious Organizations Concerning Personal or Family History. A statement of birth, legitimacy, ancestry, marriage, divorce, death, relationship by blood or marriage, or similar facts of personal or family history, contained in a regularly kept record of a religious organization.
(12)Certificates of Marriage, Baptism, and Similar Ceremonies. A statement of fact contained in a certificate:
(A) made by a person who is authorized by a religious organization or by law to perform the act certified;
(B) attesting that the person performed a marriage or similar ceremony or administered a sacrament; and
(C) purporting to have been issued at the time of the act or within a reasonable time after it.
(13)Family Records A statement of fact about personal or family history contained in a family record, such as a Bible, genealogy, chart, engraving on a ring, inscription on a portrait, or engraving on an urn or burial marker.
(14)Records of Documents That Affect an Interest in Property. The record of a document that purports to establish or affect an interest in property if: (A) the record is admitted to prove the content of the original recorded document, along with its signing and its delivery by each person who purports to have signed it; (B) the record is kept in a public office; and (C) a statute authorizes recording documents of that kind in that office.
(15)Statements in Documents That Affect an Interest in Property. A statement contained in a document that purports to establish or affect an interest in property if the matter stated was relevant to the document's purpose - unless later dealings with the property are inconsistent with the truth of the statement, or the purport of the document.
(16)Statements in Ancient Documents. A statement in a document that is at least 20 years old and whose authenticity is established.
(17)Market Reports and Similar Commercial Publications Market quotations, lists, directories, or other compilations that are generally relied on by the public or by persons in particular occupations.
(18)Statements in Learned Treatises, Periodicals, or Pamphlets. A statement contained in a treatise, periodical, or pamphlet if:
(A) the statement is called to the attention of an expert witness on cross-examination or relied on by the expert on direct examination; and
(B) the publication is established as a reliable authority by the expert's admission or testimony, by another expert's testimony, or by judicial notice.

If admitted, the statement may be read into evidence but not received as an exhibit unless the Court finds that the probative value of the statement as an exhibit outweighs the prejudicial effect of its admission.

(19)Reputation Concerning Personal or Family History. A reputation among a person's family by blood, adoption, or marriage - or among a person's associates or in the community -concerning the person's birth, adoption, legitimacy, ancestry, marriage, divorce, death, relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage, ancestry or other similar facts of personal or family history.
(20)Reputation Concerning Boundaries or General History. A reputation in a community - arising before the controversy, concerning boundaries of lands in the community or customs that affect the land, or concerning general historical events important to that community, state, or nation.
(21)Reputation Concerning Character. A reputation among a person's associates or in the community concerning the person's character.
(22)Judgment of a Previous Conviction. Evidence of a final judgment of conviction if:
(A) the judgment was entered after a trial or guilty plea, but not a nolo contendere plea;
(B) the conviction was for a crime punishable by death or by imprisonment for more than a year;
(C) the evidence is admitted to prove any fact essential to the judgment; and
(D) when offered by the prosecutor in a criminal case for a purpose other than impeachment, the judgment was against the defendant.

The pendency of an appeal may be shown but does not affect admissibility.

(23)Judgments Involving Personal, Family, or General History, or a Boundary. A judgment that is admitted to prove a matter of personal, family, or general history, or boundaries, if the matter:
(A) was essential to the judgment; and
(B) could be proved by evidence of reputation.
(24)Other Exceptions [(Transferred to Rule 807)

N.H. R. Evid. 803

Amended April 20, 2017, eff. 7/1/2017.

2016 NHRE Update Committee Note

The amendments made by supreme court order dated April 20, 2017, effective July 1, 2017, made stylistic and substantive changes to the rule.

New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(4), as amended, continues to include a requirement that the court find that statements made for medical diagnosis or treatment were made under circumstances indicating their trustworthiness. This requirement is not included in Federal Rule of Evidence 803(4). To eliminate this requirement would make this rule inconsistent with the other exceptions to the hearsay rule.

The amendment of New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(5) includes a substantive change relating to the admissibility of the recorded recollection as an exhibit. The language of the previous New Hampshire rule stated that past recollection recorded, "may be received as an exhibit unless the court, in its discretion, finds that such admission is unduly cumulative or prejudicial." Because past recollection recorded is the statement of a witness who can no longer remember and is therefore subject to only limited cross-examination, the document should not be allowed as an exhibit unless offered by an adverse party, as is provided in the federal rule.

Unlike the federal rule, New Hampshire Rule 803(5) includes the language, "or played before a jury," to make clear that a recorded recollection may include an audio or video recording.

New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(10), as amended, adds language to make clear that the lack of a public record exception to the hearsay rule shall apply only if neither the possible source of the information nor other circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness. This language was not included in either the New Hampshire Rule adopted in 1985 or the federal rule. Not including this language would make this rule inconsistent with New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(7), regarding ordinary business records, and 803(8)(B), regarding public records.

New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(18) continues to include the statement, "If admitted, the statement may be read into evidence but may not be received as an exhibit unless the Court finds that the probative value of the statement as an exhibit outweighs the prejudicial effect of its admission." The prior New Hampshire rule allowed the judge discretion with respect to whether learned treatises can be admitted as exhibits after being read to the jury. The federal rule does not allow treatises to be admitted as exhibits under any circumstance. Because these treatises can sometimes be lengthy and difficult to understand when only received orally, this aspect of the New Hampshire rule has been retained.

New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(22) is new.

New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(24) has been transferred to New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 807.

For additional guidance regarding changes to the rule see the notes following Federal Rules of Evidence 803 (Notes of Advisory Committee on 1997 and 2000 amendments).