The following are not excluded by the rule against hearsay, regardless of whether the declarant is available as a witness:
A statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant perceiveed it.
A statement relating to a startling event or condition, made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement that it caused.
A statement of the declarant's then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent or plan), or emotional, sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the validity or terms of the declarant's will.
If admitted, the record may be read into evidence or played before a jury but may be received as an exhibit only if offered by an adverse party.
This exception shall apply only if neither the possible source of the information nor other circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness.
If admitted, the statement may be read into evidence but not received as an exhibit unless the Court finds that the probative value of the statement as an exhibit outweighs the prejudicial effect of its admission.
The pendency of an appeal may be shown but does not affect admissibility.
N.H. R. Evid. 803
2016 NHRE Update Committee Note
The amendments made by supreme court order dated April 20, 2017, effective July 1, 2017, made stylistic and substantive changes to the rule.
New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(4), as amended, continues to include a requirement that the court find that statements made for medical diagnosis or treatment were made under circumstances indicating their trustworthiness. This requirement is not included in Federal Rule of Evidence 803(4). To eliminate this requirement would make this rule inconsistent with the other exceptions to the hearsay rule.
The amendment of New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(5) includes a substantive change relating to the admissibility of the recorded recollection as an exhibit. The language of the previous New Hampshire rule stated that past recollection recorded, "may be received as an exhibit unless the court, in its discretion, finds that such admission is unduly cumulative or prejudicial." Because past recollection recorded is the statement of a witness who can no longer remember and is therefore subject to only limited cross-examination, the document should not be allowed as an exhibit unless offered by an adverse party, as is provided in the federal rule.
Unlike the federal rule, New Hampshire Rule 803(5) includes the language, "or played before a jury," to make clear that a recorded recollection may include an audio or video recording.
New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(10), as amended, adds language to make clear that the lack of a public record exception to the hearsay rule shall apply only if neither the possible source of the information nor other circumstances indicate a lack of trustworthiness. This language was not included in either the New Hampshire Rule adopted in 1985 or the federal rule. Not including this language would make this rule inconsistent with New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(7), regarding ordinary business records, and 803(8)(B), regarding public records.
New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(18) continues to include the statement, "If admitted, the statement may be read into evidence but may not be received as an exhibit unless the Court finds that the probative value of the statement as an exhibit outweighs the prejudicial effect of its admission." The prior New Hampshire rule allowed the judge discretion with respect to whether learned treatises can be admitted as exhibits after being read to the jury. The federal rule does not allow treatises to be admitted as exhibits under any circumstance. Because these treatises can sometimes be lengthy and difficult to understand when only received orally, this aspect of the New Hampshire rule has been retained.
New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(22) is new.
New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 803(24) has been transferred to New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 807.
For additional guidance regarding changes to the rule see the notes following Federal Rules of Evidence 803 (Notes of Advisory Committee on 1997 and 2000 amendments).