Nev. R. Civ. P. 51
Advisory Committee Note 2019 Amendment
The amendments reorganize Rule 51, preserving portions of former NRCP 51 and incorporating provisions from FRCP 51. NRS Chapter 16 also addresses jury instructions.
Subsection (b). Rule 51(b)(3) restates former NRCP 51(b)(2) as to modifying or refusing to give proposed instructions. Specific words and actions are not necessary, but the court and the parties should make a record of all instructions that the court or the parties propose, that the court modifies or rejects, and that the jury is given. The parties must be permitted to make a record of any objections to, or arguments concerning, the jury instructions.
Subsection (c). Rule 51(c) conforms to the federal rule, except the second sentence in Rule 51(c)(1) is retained from former NRCP 51(a)(1).
Subsection (d). Rule 51(d)(1) retains the requirement from former NRCP 51(b)(3) that the court must give jury instructions before closing arguments. At least one copy of the jury instructions must be given to the jury.
Subsection (e). Rule 51(e) conforms to FRCP 51(d).
Subsection (f). Rule 51(f)(1) is new and authorizes giving preliminary jury instructions. It contemplates that the court will give preliminary instructions before opening statements but affords the court the flexibility to do so later if appropriate. Rule 51(f)(2) corresponds to former NRCP 51(e). The provision mirrors language in the advisory committee notes to the 2003 amendments to the federal rule.
Drafter's Note
2004 Amendment
The rule is amended to conform to the 2003 amendments to the federal rule with a few exceptions.
Subdivision (a) governs requests. It mirrors subdivision (a) of the federal rule with some exceptions noted below. Subdivision (a)(1) retains the first sentence of the former rule with some technical amendments. The provision differs from the federal rule in that it specifies that written requests must be filed in the format directed by the court, requires a party to provide a citation to or a copy of any legal precedent that the party relies on to support or object to a requested instruction, and requires the requesting party to file an original and one copy of each requested instruction and to number the instructions on the copies and indicate who filed them. Subdivision (a)(2) is identical to the 2003 amendments to the federal rule and addresses unanticipated and untimely requests.
Subdivisions (b)(1)(A) and (B) track the 2003 amendments to subdivision (b)(1) and (2) of the federal rule. Subdivision (b)(1)(A) requires the court to inform the parties of the proposed instructions and the proposed action on requested instructions before instructing the jury and before final jury arguments. Subdivision (b)(1)(B) carries forward the opportunity to object established by former Rule 51, but it makes explicit the opportunity to object on the record. Subdivision (b)(2) is unique to the Nevada rule. It addresses proper record keeping regarding given and refused jury instructions and is based in part on Hawaii Rule of Civil Procedure 51(c) and in part on NRS 16.110. Subdivision (b)(3) addresses when the court should instruct the jury. The federal rule and the former Nevada rule are revised to provide that the court shall instruct the jury before final arguments. The phrase "unless a party demands otherwise" in the former Nevada rule is not retained in the revised rule.
The final sentence of subdivision (b)(3) is retained from former Rule 51; the federal rule has no counterpart.
Subdivision (c) addresses the requirements for a proper objection to an instruction or the failure to give an instruction. The provision conforms to the 2003 amendment to the federal rule. Subdivision (c)(1) retains the requirement in former Rule 51 that the objection state distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection, but it makes explicit the requirement that the objection be made on the record. Subdivision (c)(2) makes clear when an objection is timely.
Subdivision (d) addresses what is required to preserve the right to appeal the giving of an instruction or the failure to give an instruction and the applicability of plain error review where a party fails to preserve the right to appellate review. The provision conforms to the 2003 amendments to the federal rule, with some minor rewording of paragraph (1)(B).