The person's current ability to manage a mental disorder shall not be considered in a reinstatement proceeding unless an independent, licensed mental health professional mutually agreed upon by the person and the Chief Disciplinary Counsel provides evidence that the mental disorder caused or had a direct and substantial relationship to the professional misconduct. The person seeking reinstatement shall bear the burden of proving the causal relationship and current ability to manage the mental disorder. All costs of the independent licensed mental health professional in a reinstatement proceeding shall be paid by the person seeking reinstatement.
The factors noted in Rule 5.285(e) and (f) shall be considered in determining whether a person should be reinstated, and whether the person shall be reinstated with or without probation.
The report, recommendation, and response, if any, shall be filed by the Chief Disciplinary Counsel with this Court upon receipt of the response or the expiration of the time for making a response. The Court shall make a determination whether to reinstate the petitioner's license on the basis of the petition, report, recommendation, and response. Probation may be imposed by the Court as a condition of reinstatement after suspension or disbarment pursuant to Rule 5.175(h).
When the Court denies a reinstatement petition, it may state a period of time before which another petition will be considered. It may also provide guidance to the petitioner as to particular concerns or conditions that the petitioner should address before submitting another petition for reinstatement.
Mo. R. Gov. Bar Jud. 5.28