If the court finds that no probable cause of ineffective assistance of counsel exists, trial counsel may continue to represent the defendant. If the court finds that probable cause of ineffective assistance of counsel exists and the defendant is entitled to an appeal and desires an appeal, the court shall order trial counsel to file a timely notice of appeal. If the court finds that probable cause of ineffective assistance of counsel exists, within ten days of the judgment of conviction becoming final trial counsel shall withdraw and the court shall cause new counsel to be appointed if the defendant is indigent. If an appeal is filed, new counsel shall perfect the appeal. Whether or not an appeal is filed, new counsel shall be directed to ascertain whether facts and grounds exist for the filing of a motion pursuant to Rule 24.035 or Rule 29.15. If such facts and grounds exist, new counsel shall timely file the appropriate motion.
Mo. R. Crim. P. 29.07
Committee Note - 1980
The source of subparagraph (a)(1) is the first two sentences of prior Rule 27.07(b). It changes the prior rule in that it allows presentence investigations in misdemeanor cases when a probation officer is available.
Compare: Section 557.026, RSMo 1978 and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(1).
The source of the first two sentences of subparagraph (a)(2) is the last two sentences of prior Rule 27.07(b).
There is a change in that the court rather than the probation officer will decide whether there is to be a physical or mental examination of the defendant.
Compare: Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(2).
The source of the last sentence of subparagraph (a)(2) is Section 557.026, RSMo 1978.
Compare: Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(3).
The sources of the first sentence of subparagraph (b)(1) are prior Rule 27.07(a) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(a)(1).
The second sentence of subparagraph (b)(1) is substantially the same as prior Rule 27.09.
Compare: Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(a)(1).
The last sentence of subparagraph (b)(1) is substantially the same as prior Rule 27.10.
The source of subparagraph (b)(2) is prior Rule 27.08.
Subparagraph (b)(3) is new. It is the same as the first sentence of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(2).
Paragraph (c) is new. It is the same as the first two sentences of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(b)(1).
Paragraph (d) is the same as prior Rule 27.25. It is also the same as Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(d) with the reference to nolo contendere omitted.
Paragraph (e) is substantially the same as prior Rule 27.07(c).
Compare: Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e).
Paragraph (f) is new.