Miss. R. App. P. 10
Advisory Committee Historical Note
Effective June 24, 1999, Rule 10(b)(5) was amended to effect editorial changes. 735 So.2d XIX (West Miss.Cases 1999).
Effective January 1, 1999, Rule 10(b)(5) was amended to require counsel to make certifications regarding the record and to extend the examination period to 14 days. 717-722 So.2d XXVII (West Miss.Cases 1998).
Effective January 1, 1995, Miss.R.App.P. 10 replaced Miss.Sup.Ct.R. 10, embracing proceedings in the Court of Appeals. 644-647 So.2d XXXVIII-XLI (West Miss.Cases 1994).
Effective July 1, 1994, the Comment to Miss.Sup.Ct.R. 10 was amended to delete references to repealed statutes and material concerning the transition from statutory procedures to Rule practice. 632-635 So.2d LI (West Miss.Cases 1994).
Comment
Rule 10 is based on Fed. R. App. P. 10, taking into account modifications suggested by the more recent Ala. R. App. P. 10 and Tenn. R. App. P. 24.
The purpose of the Rule is to permit and encourage parties to include in the record on appeal only those matters material to the issues on appeal. While subdivision (b) will govern most appeals, subdivisions (c) and (d) provide alternate methods of preparing the record, either when no transcript is available, or when the parties can agree on a "statement of the case" that will adequately present the issues on appeal.
Subdivision (b) eliminates the confusion that followed City of Mound Bayou v. Roy Collins Const. Co., 457 So. 2d 337 (Miss. 1984). That case directed court reporters to record everything transpiring at trial, including voir dire and bench and chambers conferences. It also, however, ended the jurisdictional requirement of designating the record pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. 9-13-33(1) to (4) (Supp. 1986). In doing so, it inadvertently encouraged use of the entire record, a practice the Court then condemned in Byrd v. F-S Prestress, Inc., 464 So. 2d 63, 69 (Miss. 1985). This rule reinstates the express requirement that the appellant designate those parts of the record to be included on appeal. Form 2 in the Appendix of Forms is a form for designation of the record. This requirement is no longer jurisdictional, but a failure to comply with it could lead to dismissal pursuant to Rule 2(a)(2). This is consistent with federal practice.
Pursuant to subdivision (b)(3), a general designation will not be construed to include certain papers normally irrelevant to the issues on appeal. The rule thus encourages the omission of these nonessential matters. Because counsel customarily do not file trial court briefs with the clerk, briefs are not included in the (b)(3) list. Briefs do not normally belong in a record on appeal, unless necessary to show that an issue was presented to the trial court.
A designation of certain issues under subdivision (b)(4) does not preclude a party from stating other issues in its brief under Rule 28(a)(3). However, a party asserting other issues in its brief will bear responsibility for the cost of preparing any additional portions of the record subsequently designated by any other party in response to the statement of additional issues. As a result, accurate designation under (b)(4) is advisable.
Subdivision (f) clearly states that the flexible procedures of this rule are not intended to permit a party to augment the record with matters entered ex parte.
.