Judicial records are presumed to be open to the public for inspection. Except as otherwise provided by the Rules in this Chapter or by other applicable law, the custodian of a judicial record shall permit a person to inspect a judicial record in accordance with Rules 16-922 through 16-924. Subject to the Rules in this Chapter, inspection of case records through the MDEC program is governed by Title 20 of the Maryland Rules.
Cross reference: See Rules 16-922, 16-923, 16-924, and 20-109.
To protect judicial records and prevent unnecessary interference with the official business and duties of the custodian and other judicial personnel, a clerk is not required to permit public inspection of a case record filed with the clerk for docketing in a judicial action or a notice record filed for recording and indexing until the document has been docketed or recorded and indexed.
Unless a judicial proceeding is not open to the public or the court expressly orders otherwise and except for identifying information shielded pursuant to law, a case record that consists of an exhibit (1) submitted in support of or in opposition to a motion or (2) marked for identification by the clerk at a hearing or trial or offered in evidence, whether or not admitted, is subject to inspection, notwithstanding that the record otherwise would not have been subject to inspection under the Rules in this Chapter.
Cross reference: See Rules 2-516, 3-516, and 4-322 concerning exhibits.
Committee note: Section (c) is based on the general principle that the public has a right to know the evidence upon which a court acts in making decisions, except to the extent that a superior need to protect privacy, safety, or security recognized by law permits particular evidence, or the evidence in particular cases, to be shielded. See Rule 16-934 authorizing a court to permit inspection of a case record that is not otherwise subject to inspection or to deny inspection of a case record that otherwise would be subject to inspection.
Committee note: The intent of subsection (d)(3) is to deal with the situation in which a requester or affiliated requesters seek a significant number of records or parts of records that would take far more than two hours to locate and produce and arbitrarily break up the request into multiple separate smaller requests in order to avoid having to pay what would be a legitimate fee for the overall effort required. When this becomes apparent, the custodian may aggregate the separate requests and treat them as a single request for all of the records. This authority is not intended to curtail the ability of the custodian and the requester to negotiate in good faith a narrowing of the request.
Md. R. Ct. Admin. 16-904
This Rule is derived from former Rule 16-903(2019).