Committee note: The jurisdiction of the circuit courts, the District Court, and the Orphans' Court is not affected by section (a) of this Rule. For example, the District Court has concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit court over proceedings under Code, Family Law Article, Title 4, Subtitle 5, and the Orphans' Courts and circuit courts have concurrent jurisdiction over guardianships of the person of a minor and over protective proceedings for minors under Code, Estates and Trusts Article, § 13-105.
Committee note: This subsection is not intended to interfere with existing projects that provide assistance to self-represented litigants.
Committee note: Examples of additional family support services that may be provided include general mediation programs, case managers, and family follow-up services.
Committee note: This Rule neither requires nor prohibits the assignment of one or more judges to hear family division cases on a full-time basis. Rather, it allows each County Administrative Judge the flexibility to determine how that county's judicial assignments are to be made so that actions in the family division are heard expeditiously. Additional matters for county-by-county determination include whether and to what extent magistrates, special magistrates, and examiners are used to assist in the resolution of family division cases. Nothing in this Rule affects the authority of a circuit court judge to act on any matter within the jurisdiction of the circuit court and properly assigned to that judge.
Cross reference: For rules concerning the referral of matters to magistrates as of course, see Rules 2-541 and 9-208.
Md. R. Ct. Admin. 16-307
This Rule is derived from former Rule 16-204(2016).