Cross reference: See Code, Real Property Article, §§ 7-101(a) and 7-301(f)(1).
Cross reference: See Rules 2-311(b), 1-203, and 1-204, concerning the time allowed for filing a response to the motion.
Committee note: The failure to grant loss mitigation that should have been granted in an action to foreclose a lien on owner-occupied residential property may be a defense to the right of the plaintiff to foreclose in the pending action. If that defense is raised, the motion must state specific reasons why loss mitigation pursuant to a loss mitigation program should have been granted.
To the extent permitted in Rule 14-212, the motion may include a request for referral to alternative dispute resolution pursuant to Rule 14-212.
Committee note: A motion based on the failure to grant loss mitigation in an action to foreclose a lien on owner-occupied residential property must be denied unless the motion sets forth good cause why loss mitigation pursuant to a loss mitigation program should have been granted is stated in the motion.
Md. R. Prop. Sales 14-211
This Rule is new.
HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES
2010 Orders
The June 7, 2010, order, rewrote subsec. (a)(2); in subsec. (a)(3)(F), substituted "To the extent permitted in Rule 14-212, the motion for "The motion; and inserted Committee notes following subsecs. (a)(3)(B), (b)(1)(C), and (e). Subsection (a)(2) previously read:
"(2) Time For Filing. In an action to foreclose a lien on residential property, a motion by a borrower or record owner to stay the sale and dismiss the action shall be filed within 15 days after service pursuant to Rule 14-209 of an order to docket or complaint to foreclose. A motion to stay and dismiss by a person not entitled to service under Rule 14-209 shall be filed within 15 days after the moving party first became aware of the action. For good cause, the court may extend the time for filing the motion or excuse non-compliance.
"Cross reference: See Rules 2-311(b), 1-203, and 1-204, concerning the time allowed for filing a response to the motion.
2011 Orders
The October 11, 2011, order, in section (a)(2)(A)(iii)(c), substituted "the expiration of the period of the extension for "90 days after the date of the transmittal.
2013 Orders
The May 1, 2013, order, amended the Rule to change the term "foreclosure mediation to the term "postfile mediation in (a)(2).
Committee note: If the court finds that the plaintiff has no right to foreclose in the pending action because loss mitigation should have been granted, the court may stay entry of its order of dismissal, pending further order of court, so that loss mitigation may be implemented.