Me. R. Prof. Cond. 1.17A
A lawyer or a law firm may sell or purchase a law practice, or an area of law practice, including good will, if all of the following conditions are satisfied:
Me. R. Prof. Cond. 1.17A
COMMENT
[1] The practice of law is a profession, not merely a business. Clients are not commodities that can be purchased and sold at will. Pursuant to this Rule, when a lawyer or an entire firm ceases to practice or changes its practice mix, and other lawyers or firms take over the representation, the selling lawyer or firm may obtain compensation for the reasonable value of the transferred practice, as may withdrawing partners of law firms. See Rules 5.4 & 5.6.
Client Confidences, Consent and Notice
[2] Negotiations between a seller and a prospective purchaser prior to disclosure of information relating to a specific representation of an identifiable client no more violate the confidentiality provisions of Model Rule 1.6 than do preliminary discussions concerning the possible association of another lawyer or mergers between firms, with respect to which client consent is not required. Providing the purchaser with client-specific information relating to the representation and the file is limited as set forth in Rule 1.6(b)(6).
[3] A lawyer or law firm ceasing to practice cannot be required to remain in practice because some clients cannot be given actual notice of the proposed purchase. Because these clients cannot themselves consent to the purchase or direct any other disposition of their files, the Rule requires that the Board of Overseers of the Bar must be given notice and an opportunity to be heard through its Bar Counsel.
[4] All elements of client autonomy, including the client's absolute right to discharge a lawyer and transfer the representation to another, survive the sale of the practice or area of practice.
Fee Arrangements Between Client and Purchaser
[5] The sale may not be financed by increases in fees charged to the clients of the practice. Existing arrangements between the seller and the client as to fees and the scope of the representation must be honored by the purchaser.
Other Applicable Ethical Standards
[6] Lawyers participating in the sale of a law practice or a practice area are subject to the ethical standards applicable to involving another lawyer in the representation of a client. These include, for example, the seller's obligation to exercise competence in identifying a purchaser qualified to assume the practice and the purchaser's obligation to undertake the representation competently, see Rule 1.1; the obligation to avoid disqualifying conflicts, and to secure the client's informed consent for those conflicts that can be agreed to, see Rule 1.7 regarding conflicts and Rule 1.0(e) for the definition of informed consent; and the obligation to protect information relating to the representation, see Rules 1.6 and 1.9.
[7] If approval of the substitution of the purchasing lawyer for the selling lawyer is required by the rules of any tribunal in which a matter is pending, such approval must be obtained before the matter can be included in the sale. See Rule 1.16.
Applicability of the Rule
[8] This Rule applies to the sale of a law practice of a deceased, disabled or disappeared lawyer. Thus, the seller may be represented by a non-lawyer representative not subject to these Rules. However, because no lawyer may participate in a sale of a law practice that does not conform to the requirements of this Rule, the representatives of the seller as well as the purchasing lawyer can be expected to conform to those requirements.
[9] Admission to or retirement from a law partnership or professional association, retirement plans and similar arrangements, and a sale of tangible assets of a law practice, do not constitute a sale or purchase governed by this Rule.
[10] This Rule does not apply to the transfers of legal representation between lawyers when such transfers are unrelated to the sale of a practice or an area of practice.
Advisory Note - August 2015
Rule 1.17 A of the Maine Rules of Professional Conduct replaces Rule 1.17 in its entirety.
Rule 1.17 A reflects continued evolution in Maine law regarding the sale of a law practice.
Historically, sale of a law practice or client files was not allowed in Maine. That prohibition did not affect all lawyers alike. Lawyers practicing in partnerships were able to capture the value of their accumulated goodwill through retirement and buy-out provisions in their partnership agreements. Lawyers practicing as solo practitioners could not capture such value due to the prohibitions on sale of practice. Beginning in 2000, the Advisory Committee on Professional Conduct began considering these rules, resulting first in the amendment of Rule 3.14, and in the 2009 adoption of Rule 1.17, permitting any lawyer to sell his or her law practice, so long as the lawyer left the active practice of law entirely and the practice was sold in its entirety.
More recently, the Advisory Committee began looking at this issue afresh, inspired in part by the "The Report and Recommendations of the Board of Overseers of the Bar's Task Force to Study Bar Demographics" (June 2014) and concerns that the ongoing prohibitions on the sale of part of a law practice and on the selling lawyer's continued practice of law may not be in the best interests of clients or of the Bar. Anecdotal evidence suggested that the Rule was unfamiliar to much of the Bar, but that where it was known it had prevented transactions from closing that would have seemed to have been in the interests of the lawyers and clients involved. The rule was also perceived as preventing lawyers from making socially beneficial use of their law licenses by refocusing their active practices on a particular area of law (for example, discontinuing trial work while continuing to handle real estate matters), or by continuing post-"retirement" activities such as pro bono work, mediation or mentorships, for which an active law license is required or desirable.
ABA Model Rule 1.17 allows less than all of a law practice to be sold, but it prohibits the selling lawyer from continuing to engage in the area of law practice sold, either entirely or within a defined geographical area. The Advisory Committee recommended amending the Maine Rules to allow sale of part of a practice but found the rationale for requiring discontinuance of the practice of law, either entirely or within a geographic or area-of-law limitation, to be a non-competition rationale more suitably protected by private agreement between buyer and seller than by Rule.
Sale of a practice must be conducted in a manner that protects clients.
Rule 1.17 A omits the requirement in Rule 1.17 that the purchaser be registered with the Board of Overseers. Only individual lawyers register with the Board, but a purchaser may be a'law firm, not an individual lawyer. The amended language requiring that the purchaser be authorized to represent clients in the State of Maine and to handle the matters being transferred is meant to serve the same purpose as the prior language-namely, to ensure that the purchaser can properly engage in the practice of law in Maine and that the clients whose files are being transferred will be served by lawyers authorized to handle the matters transferred-without suggesting that only an individual can act as a purchaser.
The authorization of sale of part of a practice is intended to cover a sale that would generally be understood as a sale of substantially all of a lawyer's files in a particular area of law. It is not intended to authorize any attempted end-run of the rules governing fee sharing, solicitation or any aspect of the rules that prevents an ongoing trade in brokering clients or their matters as commodities.
Like the ABA Model Rule and former Maine Rule 1.17, Rule 1.17 A continues to require written notice to the current and former clients whose files are to be transferred to new counsel. Rule 1.17 A, however, changes the provision regarding the steps to be taken when certain clients cannot be given written notice. Rule 1.17 A does not require a court order in all such cases. The Advisory Committee believes that notice to Bar Counsel sufficiently protects client interests, where Bar Counsel is able to recommend additional steps to effect notice if the unsuccessful efforts to give written notice have somehow been inadequate, and where Bar Counselor the seller can seek court intervention in the event that a selling lawyer and Bar Counsel cannot agree on those further steps that might be warranted to attempt to effect notice.
The Advisory Committee recommended abrogation of Rule 1.17 and adoption of Rule 1.1 7A because the existing Comments to Rule 1.17 would be inconsistent with the amendments to the Rule itself.
.