Me. R. Civ. P. 53
Advisory Committee's Notes - 1981
Rule 53(e)(5) is added to cure a difficulty that has arisen in practice under the original rule: There is no provision for resubmission of a case to the referee for clarification or amendment of his report prior to its submission to the court. As originally drafted, the rule apparently envisioned that in such situations objections would be made under Rule 53(e)(2) and the objecting party would then seek remand by the court after review of the record. This is a very cumbersome procedure, especially with a voluminous transcript wholly unfamiliar to the Superior Court justice.
The amended rule provides a procedure for such situations similar to that contained in Rule 52(b) for amendment of the court's findings in a case tried without a jury. Under the new provision, the referee may, on motion made within five days after notice of filing of the report, make amended or additional findings or recommendations. These new matters, or his denial of the motion, are to be contained in a supplemental report which is to be filed in the same manner as the original report. Objections to either the original or the supplemental report must be made within ten days, as provided in Rule 53(e)(2).
Advisory Committee's Notes 1991
Rule 53(a) is amended to permit reference in the District Court. Given the broad range of jurisdiction now permitted to that court, there is good reason to make available a procedural device with the potential for saving time and expense for the parties and reducing burdens on the trial docket. Referees' reports will be subject to objection in the District Court. Appeal from any judgment entered will lie to the Superior Court and then to the Law Court as in other actions.
Advisory Committee's Notes March 1, 1998
Rule 53(e) is amended to correct a misreference that occurred when Rule 6(d) and Rule 7 were amended on July 1, 1990. The correct reference is now Rule 7(b).
Annotations:
Rule 53: Review. Sylvester v. Vitagliano, 2002 ME 141, 9.
Rule 53: Standard of Superior Court Review of Report. Hennessy v. Fairley, 2002 ME 76.
Rule 53(b): Referee appointment-discretion. Estate of McCormick, 2001 ME 24, 12-14.