Should a complaint be filed involving the subject matter and the attorney who requested the advisory opinion, the Bar Counsel who rendered the opinion shall be recused from any investigation and prosecution of the complaint.
Me. Bar. R. 2
Reporter's Notes - June 2015
Rule 2(a) is based on Model Rule 4. The committee considered former Maine Bar Rules 4(d)(1) and (2), and 5(a) and language contained in the Board's Personnel Manual. The revised rule retains the "Bar Counsel" name, rejecting the Model Rules' nomenclature of "Disciplinary Counsel." The members of the committee determined that the Maine Bar was accustomed to the "Bar Counsel" name and that the term more accurately described the functions of the office. The revised rule follows the current Maine practice. The committee also rejected the Model Rules' prohibition on former Bar Counsel from representing a respondent in any disciplinary proceeding for a period of one year following completion of the Bar Counsel's service. The committee felt that the Model Rule was too inflexible and was inappropriate for a small state like Maine.
Rule 2(b) is based upon Model Rule 4(B) and is similar to former Maine Bar Rule 7.1(b)(c)(d)(e). Rule 2(b)(3) provides Bar Counsel with duties not currently included for that position, e.g., making referrals to the Central Intake Office, issuance of stays, and use of the Alternatives to Discipline Program (see Rule 13(c) ). While Maine Bar Rule 7.1(c) and (d) provide Bar Counsel with discretion to provide a complainant with the respondent's informal response letter, Rule 2(b)(6)(A) requires Bar Counsel to always promptly provide a complainant with "a copy of any written communication from the respondent to Bar Counsel relating to the matter (unless subject to another individual's privilege claim)." Rule 2(b)(6)(B) and (7) also requires Bar Counsel to issue and provide to complainants the "dismissal guidelines" for use by the Central Intake Office and Bar Counsel. The former Maine Bar Rules include no such comparable guidelines.
Rule 2(c) is based upon former Board Regulation 28 and Model Rule 4(C). The committee rejected the Model Rule's prohibition of the issuance of advisory opinions by Bar Counsel. Instead, the committee retained current Maine practice which permits Bar Counsel to render advisory opinions. The members of the committee concluded that members of the bar had come to rely on informal advisory opinions rendered by Bar Counsel. The committee felt that so long as the opinions are informal and non-binding, and the requesting attorney is so advised, a complete ban on such opinions was unwarranted.
Rule 2(d) is derived from Model Rule 4(D) and Board Regulation No. 57. The revised rule is substantially in accord with the Model Rule.
Rule 2(e) is derived from Model Rule 4(E). There is no equivalent in the former Maine Bar Rules.
.