Id. Code. Judi. Cond. 2.8
Comment
[1] The duty to hear all proceedings with patience and courtesy is not inconsistent with the duty imposed in Rule 2.5 to dispose promptly of the business of the court. Judges can be efficient and businesslike while being patient and deliberate.
[2] Commending or criticizing jurors for their verdict may imply a judicial expectation in future cases and may impair a juror's ability to be fair and impartial in a subsequent case.
[3] A judge who is not otherwise prohibited by law from doing so may meet with jurors who choose to remain after trial but should be careful not to discuss the merits of the case. Judges should be aware of the implications from Gillingham Construction, Inc. v. Newby Wiggins Construction, 142 Idaho 15, 121 P.3d 946 (2005), which prohibits certain communication with jurors by judges.