If a party shows that when the party was served with notice under this subdivision (b)(2) the party was unable through the exercise of diligence to obtain counsel to represent the party at the taking of the deposition, or the party establishes a Rule 11 violation, the deposition may not be used against that party.
You are hereby notified that you may request a review of the completed transcript or recording of your deposition. You must make this request before the completion of your deposition. If you make such a request, after being notified by the court reporter or other officer taking the deposition that the transcript or recording is available, you will have 30 days to: (1) review the transcript or recording; and (2) if there are changes in form or substance, to sign a statement reciting such changes and the reasons for making them. |
Failure to substantially comply with this notice requirement prior to the completion of the deposition shall preclude the use of the transcript or recording until the deponent has been provided 30 days within which to review the transcript or recording, and, if there are changes, to sign a statement reciting them and the reasons therefor. Any changes shall be appended to the transcript or recording.
All objections made at the time of the examination to the qualifications of the officer taking the deposition, or to the manner of taking it, or to the evidence presented, or to the conduct of any party, and any other objection to the proceedings, shall be noted by the officer upon the deposition. Evidence objected to shall be taken subject to the objections. In lieu of participating in the oral examination, parties served with notice of taking a deposition may transmit written questions in a sealed envelope on the party taking the deposition and that party shall transmit them to the officer, who shall propound them to the witness and record the answers verbatim.
Documents and things produced for inspection, during the examination of the witness, shall, upon the request of a party, be marked for identification and annexed to and returned with the deposition, and may be inspected and copied by any party, except that (A) the person producing the materials may substitute copies to be marked for identification, if the person producing the materials affords to all parties fair opportunity to verify the copies by comparisons with the originals, and (B) if the person producing the materials requests their return, the officer shall mark them, give each party an opportunity to inspect and copy them, and return them to the person producing them, and the materials may then be used in the same manner as if annexed to and returned with the deposition. Any party may move for an order that the original be annexed to and returned with the deposition to the officer or the court, pending final disposition of the case.
When any party seeks to submit a deposition pursuant to this rule, the officer who took the deposition shall upon the party's request promptly file the deposition, or, if time permits, send it by registered or certified mail to the clerk of court for filing. The party who requested filing shall give prompt notice of the filing to all other parties.
Haw. Dis. Ct. R. Civ. P. 30
COMMENTS:
Adopts HRCP Rule 30 with changes to gender neutral language and some alterations. The old language of Rule 30(a) was substituted for that of Rule 26(a) as it was decided that leave of court should still be necessary to take a deposition. On average, the dollar amounts in District Court are small and an unfair advantage could be taken by one side forcing another to concede by escalating legal costs and fees. Other minor changes were made to adapt to new procedures in the District Court or to make the section more understandable. Furthermore, an exception of impending death of a witness was added as an exception not requiring leave of court and it was felt that a stipulation on the record to take a deposition was just as good as in writing.