R. Judi. Qual. Commi. Ga. 11
Commentary
[1] In the initial stages of the disciplinary case, confidentiality is necessary to protect a judge's reputation from unfounded charges and to protect witnesses from possible recriminations while a claim is being investigated.
[2] Disclosing the existence of complaints that were considered and dismissed is unfair to the judge and undermines the work of the Commission. It is unfair to allow any adverse inferences to be drawn from the mere existence of a complaint when it was not substantial enough to state a possible ground for discipline. The Commission will have greater credibility if it does not release information about dismissed complaints under any circumstances. If the judge wishes to have such information disclosed, the judge may release the information.
[3] Once the formal charges have been filed and served upon the judge, the policy emphasis shifts from confidentiality to the public's right to know. The integrity of the judicial system is better protected by an open public hearing than by a closed hearing. It is no longer possible to protect the identity of the witnesses because their identity must be disclosed through the discovery to which the respondent is entitled.
[4] Disclosures that the Investigative Panel or the Hearing Panel may determine to be necessary under Rule 11.E (2) (a) or (b) include disclosures to law enforcement authorities and potential victims of substantial evidence that a judge has committed, is committing, or is intending to commit a serious crime, and similar disclosures to attorney disciplinary authorities regarding serious violations of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct by judges who are lawyers. The timing and extent of such disclosures is at the discretion of the Investigative Panel or the Hearing Panel, depending on the procedural status of the case.
[5] When the alleged misconduct or incapacity of a judge who is the subject of a complaint has been publicized and the public would expect the Commission to be investigating such conduct, the Investigative Panel may authorize the chairperson or the Director to publicly confirm the existence of such an investigation pursuant to Rule 11.E (2) (a).
[6] The Commission's administrative records and meetings that do not disclose specific, confidential disciplinary and incapacity matters should be available and open to the public like the records and meetings of other governmental agencies in this state.
[7] The Constitution provides for confidentiality of certain findings and records of the Commission in proceedings under Rule 15.A. See Rule 15.A (4).