Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 49
COMMENT TO 2020 AMENDMENTS
Consistent with the 2018 federal amendments to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49, the filing and service provisions, which were previously addressed by reference to the civil rules, are now included in Rule 49.
COMMENT TO 2016 AMENDMENTS
This rule has been redrafted to conform to the general restyling of the federal rules in 2002. It differs from the federal rule in several respects.
Paragraph (a) includes "opposition" in the list of papers a party must serve on every other party.
Consistent with the former rule, paragraph (c) explicitly requires the clerk to notify the parties of orders on motions entered outside their presence. The clerk must mail notice of the entry of the orders to the parties and must make an entry on the docket that the notice has been mailed. This requirement is in keeping with District of Columbia Court of Appeals Rule 4(b)(5), which defines entry of an order made outside the presence of the parties with reference to the entry on the criminal docket reflecting the mailing of notice.
Paragraph (e) is retained from the former rule. It was added to insure that all parties are informed of any communication delivered to a judicial officer. The term "judge" in former paragraph (e) of this rule was replaced with the term "judge or magistrate judge" to make it applicable to communications by counsel with magistrate judges. The parenthetical phrase "other than those regarding matters to be heard ex parte" was added to parallel similar language in paragraph (a) of this rule.