Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 36-I
COMMENT TO 2016 AMENDMENTS
This rule, retained from the former rule, has no federal counterpart. In keeping with general stylistic changes made to the federal rules, the rule has been redrafted to make it more easily understood and to maintain consistency throughout the rules.
The former version of paragraph (a) allowed for the recordation of proceedings by electronic sound recording device "when permitted by rule of court." Federal Rules 5.1(g), 6(e)(1), 11(g), 12(f), 32.1(b)(1)(B), 41(d)(2)(C),(d)(3)(D), and 58(e) added new provisions or revised former provisions by stating that proceedings must be recorded "by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device." Paragraph (a) of this rule was amended to track the federal rules' language. Accordingly, all proceedings in the Criminal Division of the Superior Court must be recorded "by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device."
Due to the revision of paragraph (a), former paragraph (g), regarding electronic recording devices, was deleted as unnecessary.