Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 32
COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS
This rule has been amended consistent with the 2008 amendments to the federal rule. Specifically, subsection (b)(1)(A) has been amended to add a requirement that the presentence investigation include information concerning restitution in cases in which the law permits restitution. Subsection (b)(2) has been amended to include a requirement that the report contain information about the financial impact of the crime on any victim.
References to "victim as defined in D.C. Code § 23-1905(2) " were shortened to "victim" in light of the new definition in Rule 1(d)(12).
The 10-day deadlines in this rule have been changed to 14 days in light of the timecalculation changes made to Rule 45.
Certain 2011 amendments to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(d)(2) (which corresponds to subsection (b)(2) of this rule) have been rejected as locally inapplicable.
COMMENT TO 2016 AMENDMENTS
This rule has been redrafted to conform to the general restyling of the federal rules in 2002. It differs from the federal rule in several respects.
This rule omits all references to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. It also omits paragraph (a) of the federal rule (Definitions), because its definitions are locally inapplicable.
Paragraph (a) of this rule, regarding the time of sentencing, corresponds to paragraph (b) of the federal rule. It contains provisions implementing The Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2000 (D.C. Code § 23-1901 et seq. (2012 Repl.)).
Paragraph (b) of this rule, regarding presentence investigations, corresponds to paragraphs (c)-(g) of the federal rule. It differs from the federal rule to reflect local practice. It requires a presentence report in felony cases, unless the defendant waives it or the court makes certain findings. A report is required in misdemeanor cases only if the court requests one.
Paragraph (c) of this rule, regarding sentencing, corresponds to paragraph (i) of the federal rule. Subparagraph (c)(3), "Court Determinations," is identical to its federal counterpart, but is new to this rule. It requires the court to make findings with respect to any disputed portion of the presentence report or other sentencing matter, unless that portion will not affect the sentence or the court will not consider it. Any such finding must be reduced to writing and appended to the presentence report.
Subparagraph (c)(4)(B) contains provisions implementing The Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2000 (D.C. Code § 23-1901 et seq. (2012 Repl.))
Paragraph (d), concerning advice of appellate rights, corresponds to paragraph (j) of the federal rule. Consistent with the former Superior Court rule, it provides that the court has no duty to advise the defendant of any right to appeal after a guilty or nolo contendere plea.
Material formerly in paragraph (e), concerning plea withdrawal, has been moved to Rule 11.
Paragraph (e), regarding motions to suspend or modify child support payments, was added to reflect the requirements of D.C. Code § 23-112 a (2012 Repl.). That section, and hence paragraph (e) of this rule, apply whether the proceeding is the initial sentencing or a probation revocation resulting in imprisonment for more than 30 days.
Paragraph (f), regarding judgment, corresponds to paragraph (k) of the federal rule. It omits provisions dealing with property subject to forfeiture. Proceedings for the forfeiture of property in the Superior Court are brought pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 71A -I.
Material formerly in paragraph (g), concerning production of witness statements, has been moved to subparagraph (c)(2) of this rule.
Paragraph (g), concerning "probation before judgment" under D.C. Code § 48904.01(e)(1) (2014 Repl.), has no federal counterpart. It has been revised to make it easier to read. No change in substance is intended.
References in the former rule to the "Social Services Division" have been replaced with the "Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency," as the latter agency is now responsible for preparation of presentence reports and supervision of probationers.