Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 23
COMMENT TO 2016 AMENDMENTS
This rule has been redrafted to conform to the general restyling of the federal rules in 2002. It differs from the federal rule in several respects.
Subparagraph (a)(1) retains the requirement that the jury trial waiver be made "orally in open court," as well as in writing, to reflect the requirements of D.C. Code § 16-705(a) (2012 Repl.) as interpreted by District of Columbia case law. See Jackson v. United States, 262 A.2d 106 (D.C. 1970); see also Lopez v. United States , 615 A.2d 1140 (D.C. 1992).
Subparagraph (b)(2)(B) retains the phrase "just cause" to be consistent with subparagraph (b)(3).
Subparagraph (b)(3) retains the phrases "due to extraordinary circumstances," "finds it necessary" and "just cause" (in place of the phrase "good cause" used in the federal rule) to reflect the requirements of D.C. Code § 16-705(c) (2012 Repl.).