Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 1
COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS
Subsections (d)(11), defining "telephone," and (d)(12), defining "victim," were added to correspond with the 2008 and 2011 amendments to the federal rule. The definition of "video teleconference" is unique to the Superior Court rule; it was added to explain the term, which appears throughout the rules.
COMMENT TO 2016 AMENDMENTS
This rule has been redrafted to conform to the general restyling of the federal rules in 2002. It differs from the federal rule in several respects.
Paragraph (a) makes clear that these rules apply to all criminal proceedings in the Superior Court.
D.C. Code § 11-902(b) (2012 Repl.) permits the Superior Court by rule to establish branches within the Division. This rule eliminates the Felony, Misdemeanor and District of Columbia-Traffic Branches of the Criminal Division to permit greater flexibility in case management and utilization of resources.
Paragraph (b) reflects the Chief Judge's authority pursuant to D.C. Code § 11-906(b) (2012 Repl.) to organize the business of the Superior Court. It replaces former paragraph (d).
Paragraph (d) (Definitions) differs from the federal rule in several ways to reflect local practice. In addition, consistent with the incorporation of Federal Rule 54 into Federal Rule 1, the definitional paragraphs of former Superior Court Rule 54 have been moved, as modified, to this rule.
Subparagraph (d)(3), defining "court," substitutes "judge or magistrate judge" for "federal judge" and adds the phrase "except where the term is used to mean the court as an institution."