Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 67
COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS
This rule has been amended consistent with the 2007 stylistic changes to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 67. The Superior Court rule retains two local distinctions-1) the applicable provision of the D.C. Code has been substituted for the federal statute; and 2) the requirement to deposit funds in an interest-bearing account has been omitted.
COMMENT
Substantially identical to F. R. Civ. P. 67 except for the deletion of the requirement that all deposited funds be placed in an interest-bearing account or invested in an interest-bearing instrument. The decision to place funds in such an account or instrument and to disburse those funds with accrued interest is discretionary with the Court, after due consideration of the administrative burden imposed by the accounting of such funds.
Nothing in this rule is intended to restrict the authority of the Court, upon proper application, to appoint a trustee, escrow holder, or to establish some otherwise appropriate method to retain funds pendente lite.